<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE Articles SYSTEM "HBI_DTD">
<Articles><Article><Journal><PublisherName></PublisherName><JournalTitle>Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research</JournalTitle><Issn>1735-9066</Issn><Volume>12</Volume><Issue>3</Issue><PubDate PubStatus="epublish"><Year>2008</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>29</Day></PubDate></Journal><title locale="en_US">A Comparative study on growth pattern of Low Birth Weight and Normal Birth Weight neonates</title><FirstPage>23</FirstPage><LastPage>23</LastPage><AuthorList><Author><affiliation locale="en_US">MD, Associate Professor, Department of Pediatric Nursing, School of Nursing &amp; Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences,</affiliation></Author><Author><affiliation locale="en_US">MSc, Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing &amp; Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran</affiliation></Author><Author><affiliation locale="en_US">MSc, School of Nursing &amp; Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran</affiliation></Author></AuthorList><History><PubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2010</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>13</Day></PubDate></History><abstract locale="en_US">INTRODUCTION: Low birth weight (LBW, birth weight&lt;2500g) is a significant health problem in children all around the&#13;
world. There is a direct relationship between low birth weight and infant mortality rate. One of the most important&#13;
measures to prevent childhood morbidity is growth monitoring. The present study was planned to compare the growth&#13;
rate of LBW neonates with those weighing 2500g and more at birth (normal birth weight (NBW)) during the first two&#13;
years of life.&#13;
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study, which included 218 two years old infants (109 LBW, 109 NBW).&#13;
Data gathering tool was a questionnaire. Data were analyzed by descriptive analytic statistical methods (the t- test and&#13;
the χ2 test).&#13;
RESULTS: Our findings revealed that there was a significant difference between the mean values of child weight, height&#13;
and head circumference from birth until 2 years of age between the two groups (the LBW group had lower values than&#13;
the NBW group). Height by age, weight by age and weight by height indices also had significant difference between the&#13;
two groups until 2 years of age. Growth curves in LBW group were upslope until 2 years old. Moreover, the weight&#13;
percentile of the LBW children at 2 years of age was deeper than the NBW group.&#13;
DISCUSSION: In the present study, comparison of growth parameters until 2 chart years of age and growth of both&#13;
groups showed a better growth velocity in the LBW group. The LBW growth curve moved upslope and was more compatible&#13;
with standard percentiles throughout the growth curve. However, growth of the NBW group was not fine and&#13;
more investigation is needed in this field.&#13;
KEY WORDS: Growth, low birth weight, normal birth weight, neonate</abstract><web_url>http://ijnmr.mui.ac.ir/index.php/ijnmr/article/view/23</web_url><pdf_url>http://ijnmr.mui.ac.ir/index.php/ijnmr/article/download/23/23</pdf_url></Article></Articles>

