<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE Articles SYSTEM "HBI_DTD">
<Articles><Article><Journal><PublisherName></PublisherName><JournalTitle>Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research</JournalTitle><Issn>1735-9066</Issn><Volume>17</Volume><Issue>6</Issue><PubDate PubStatus="epublish"><Year>2012</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>22</Day></PubDate></Journal><title locale="en_US">Survey of critical thinking and clinical decision making in nursing ‎student of Kerman University</title><FirstPage>764</FirstPage><LastPage>764</LastPage><Language>EN</Language><AuthorList><Author><affiliation locale="en_US">Faculty of Razi School of Nursing and Midwifery, Kerman University of Medical ‎Sciences</affiliation></Author><Author><affiliation locale="en_US">Faculty of Islamic Azad University Unit of Mashad</affiliation></Author><Author><affiliation locale="en_US">Epidemiology, Kerman ‎University of Medical Sciences</affiliation></Author></AuthorList><History><PubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2012</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>22</Day></PubDate></History><abstract locale="en_US">&lt;p&gt;Context:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;The ability to think critically is an essential element in nursing education and &amp;lrm;more specifically in nurses&amp;rsquo; clinical decision making (CDM).&amp;lrm;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Aims:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Critical thinking (CT) and CDM ability as well as their relationship were &amp;lrm;examined among nursing students of Kerman University.&amp;lrm;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Settings and Design: Study was designed in four towns: Kerman, Bam, Jiroft, and Zarand, &amp;lrm;settled in Kerman province.&amp;lrm;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Materials and Methods:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;This research was a cross-sectional descriptive correlation study. &amp;lrm;&amp;lrm;300 nursing students with different level of education were asked to fill two questionnaires &amp;lrm;including: (1) California Critical Thinking Skills Test (CCTST) and (2) Lauri and Salantera &amp;lrm;&amp;lrm;(2002) CDM instrument. Statistical Analysis Used: Data were analyzed with SPSS12 and &amp;lrm;descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: Nursing students yielded a low score (mean = &amp;lrm;&amp;lrm;5/40 from 20) of CT and a mild score (mean = 12.8 from 20) of CDM. We found positively &amp;lrm;correlation between male and CT and CDM score with mean score of the nursing student. &amp;lrm;Also CDM score in male was more than female but not significant, and Jirofts CDM &amp;lrm;nursing student was significantly better than other city.&amp;lrm;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Conclusions:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Although students that answers evaluation question in CCTST better can &amp;lrm;gave better CDM score but there isn't relationship between CT and CDM of nursing &amp;lrm;student. The finding showed that mean score of nursing student CT was low. Reason can be &amp;lrm;either due to the defects of nursing education program, teaching, and learning strategies.&amp;lrm;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Key words: Clinical research, decision making, nursing education, nursing students, &amp;lrm;thinking&lt;/p&gt;</abstract><web_url>http://ijnmr.mui.ac.ir/index.php/ijnmr/article/view/764</web_url><pdf_url>http://ijnmr.mui.ac.ir/index.php/ijnmr/article/download/764/580</pdf_url></Article></Articles>

