Kirkpatrick evaluation model for in‑service training on cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Safoura Dorri, Malekeh Akbari, Mahmoud Dorri Sedeh


Background: There are several evaluation models that can be used to evaluate the effect of in‑service training; one of them is the Kirkpatrick model. The aim of the present study is to assess the in-service training of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)
for nurses based on the Kirkpatrick’s model.
Materials and Methods: This study is a cross‑sectional study based on the Kirkpatrick’s model in which the efficacy of in‑service training of CPR to nurses was assessed in the Shahadaye Lenjan Hospital in Isfahan province in 2014. 80 nurses and Nurse’s aides participated in the study after providing informed consent. The in-service training course was evaluated in reaction, learning behavior, and results level of the Kirkpatrick model. Data were collected through a researcher-made questionnaire.
Results: The mean age of the participants was 35 ± 8.5 years. The effectiveness score obtained in the reaction level (first level in the Kirkpatrick model) was 4.2 ± 0.32. The effectiveness score in the second level of model or the learning level was 4.70 ± 0.09, which is statistically significant (P < 0.001). The effectiveness score at the third and fourth level were 4.1 ± 0.34 and 4.3 ± 0.12, respectively. Total effectiveness score was 4.35.
Conclusions: The results of this study showed that CPR in-service training has a favorable effect on all four levels of the Kirkpatrick model for nurses and nurse’s aides.


Evaluation; in-service training; Kirkpatrick model; nursing

Full Text:



Chiang FF, Birtch TA, Kwan HK. The moderating roles of job control and work-life balance practices on employee stress in the hotel and catering industry. Int J Hospitality Manage 2010;29:25-32.

Aghaee M, Aghaee R, Aghaee A. The role of behavioral dimensions job on efficiency and effectiveness of human resources. J Manage Org Culture 2015;12:809-30. [In Persian].

Alhoseini H. The Theory of Continuous Engineering C.E.O. Identification of Permanent Authenticity in the Organizations as the Field of Development of the Individual and Society. 1st ed.Bandar Abbas: University of Hormozgan Publication; 2000. p. 103.

Ologunowa CS, Akintunde BA, Adu BO. Manpower training and development: Pathway to efficient organizational performance. Am Int J Res Hum Arts Sci 2015;9:44‑52.

Hamilton R. Nurses’ knowledge and skill retention following cardiopulmonary resuscitation training: A review of the literature. J Adv Nursing 2005;51:288-97.

Shojae K, Karami M, Ahanchian MR. Evaluation the effectiveness of training programs for staff of Mashhad Ferdowsi University. Master Thesis in field of Education Management. 2011, thesis nomber: ED EDC 114. Available from: moreinfo-45241-pg-1.html.

Esteves J, Pastor J, Casanovas J. A framework proposal for monitoring and evaluating training in ERP implementation projects. Technical Research. 2002.

Rajeev P, Madan MS, Jayarajan K. Revisiting Kirkpatrick’s model—An evaluation of an academic training course. Curr Sci 2009;96:272‑6.

Kirkpatrick DL. Evaluating Training Program: The Four Level. 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: Berrett‑Koehler Publisher; 1998.

Bates R. A critical analysis of evaluation practice: The Kirkpatrick model and the principle of beneficence. Eval Program Plan 2004;27:341-7.

Kirkpatrick DL. Evaluation of Training. Training and Development Handbook: A Guide to Human Resource Development. New York: McGraw‑Hill; 1976.

Curran VR, Fleet L. A review of evaluation outcomes of web‑based continuing medical education. Med Educ 2005;39:561‑7.

Shelton S, Alliger G. Who’s afraid of level 4 evaluation? A practical approach. Training Dev 1993;47:43-7.

Pourjahromi Z, Ghafarian HR, Ghaedi H, Momeninejad M, Mohamadi M, Abasi A, et al. The effectiveness of training Course on “how to work with DC Shock Devices” for nurses, based on Kirkpatrick model. Iranian J Med Educ 2011;11:896‑901.

Omar M, Gerein N, Tarin E, Butcher C, Pearson S, Heidari G. Training evaluation: A case study of training Iranian health managers. Hum Resour Health 2009;7:20.

Abbasian A. Effectiveness of training course. Tadbir J 2006;170:52‑5.

Bakhshandeh H, Ahmadi H, Behnam M, Hamidi M. Evaluating the effectiveness of arbitration and coaching of the students based on Kirkpatrick’s model. J Sport Manage 2014;5:161-78. [In Persian].

Amiri‑Mehr M. Evaluate the effectiveness of training courses Saipa Diesel Company according to Kirkpatrick model in summer 2006. Master’s thesis, Department of Education and Psychology, University of Shahid Beheshti; 2007. pp. 11‑25.

Tavakoli S. Assessment of learners reaction from short‑term training courses for librarians of public library of Astan Quds Razavi on the first level of Kirkpatrick’s model. Electronic Journal of Libraries, Museums and Documents Center of Astan Quds Razavi. 2010;2:1‑16. [In Persian].

Abbasian A, Salimi G, Azin R. Evaluation of engineering training: Survey the effectiveness of resistant welding training course based on Kirkpatrick model, Irankhodro Co. as a case study. J Iran Eng Educ 2008;39:37‑62. [In Persian].

Madden C. Undergraduate nursing students’ acquisition and retention of CPR knowledge and skills. Nurse Educ Today 2006;26:218‑27. Epub 2005/11/30.

Association AH. BLS for Healthcare Providers. Texas: American Heart Association; 2001.

Aoki T, Asada Y, Hiroe T, Tomizawa Y. Board 105—Program innovations abstract effectiveness of American style CPR training for Japanese medical students (submission #1494). Simul Healthcare 2013;8:403.


  • There are currently no refbacks.