Effect of Breathing Technique of Blowing on the Extent of Damage to the Perineum at the Moment of Delivery: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Abstract
Introduction: One of the important tasks in managing labor is the protection of perineum. An important variable affecting this outcome is maternal pushing during the second stage of labor. This study was done to investigate the effect of breathing technique on perineal damage extention in laboring Iranian women.
Materials and Methods: This randomized clinical trial was performed on 166 nulliparous pregnant women who had reached full‑term pregnancy, had low risk pregnancy, and were candidates for vaginal delivery in two following groups: using breathing techniques (case group) and valsalva maneuver (control group). In the control group, pushing was done with holding the breath. In the case group, the women were asked to take 2 deep abdominal breaths at the onset of pain, then take another deep breath, and push 4–5 seconds with the open mouth while controlling exhalation. From the crowning stage onward, the women were directed to control their pushing, and do the blowing technique.
Results: According to the results, intact perineum was more observed in the case group (P = 0.002). Posterior tears (Grade 1, 2, and 3) was considerably higher in the control group (P = 0.003). Anterior tears (labias) and episiotomy were not significantly different in the two groups.
Conclusions: It was concluded that breathing technique of blowing can be a good alternative to Valsalva maneuver in order to reduce perineal damage in laboring women.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Barbosa AMP, Marini G, Piculo F, Rudge CV, Calderon IMP, Rudge MV. Prevalence of urinary incontinence and pelvic floor muscle dysfunction in primiparae two years after cesarean section: Cross‑sectional study. Sao Paulo Med J 2013;131:95‑9.
Bosomworth A, Bettany‑Saltikov JA. Just take a deep breath. A review to compare the effects of spontaneous versus directed Valsalva pushing in the second stage of labour on maternal and fetal wellbeing. Midwifery Digest 2006;16:157‑66.
Lemos A, Amorim MM, Dornelas de Andrade A, de Souza AI, Cabral Filho JE, Correia JB. Pushing/bearing down methods for the second stage of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015:CD009124.
Sampselle CM, Hines S. Spontaneous pushing during birth: Relationship to perineal outcomes. J Nurse Midwifery 1999;44:36‑9.
Tuuli MG, Frey HA, Odibo AO, Macones GA, Cahill AG. Immediate compared with delayed pushing in the second stage of labor: A systematic review and meta‑analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2012;120:660‑8.
Prins M, Boxem J, Lucas C, Hutton E. Effect of spontaneous pushing versus Valsalva pushing in the second stage of labour on mother and fetus: A systematic review of randomised trials. BJOG 2011;118:662‑70.
Simkin P, Ancheta R. The labor progress handbook: Rarly interventions to prevent and treat dystocia: John Wiley and Sons; 2011.
Talasz H, Kofler M, Kalchschmid E, Pretterklieber M, Lechleitner M. Breathing with the pelvic floor? Correlation of pelvic floor muscle function and expiratory flows in healthy young nulliparous women. Int Urogynecol J 2010;21:475‑81.
Albers LL, Sedler KD, Bedrick EJ, Teaf D, Peralta P. Factors related to genital tract trauma in normal spontaneous vaginal births. Birth 2006;33:94‑100.
Asali R TM, Abedian Z, Esmaeili H. Spontaneous and active pushing in second stage labor and fetal outcome in primiparous women. JBUMS 2006;8:51‑5.
Salehian T, Safdari‑Dehchshmeh F, Rahimi‑Madiseh M, Beigi M, Delaram M. Comparing the effects of spontaneous pushing versus Valsalva pushing technique on outcome of delivery in primiparous women. J Shahrekord Univ Med Sci 2012;14:31‑9.
Brink CA, Wells TJ, Sampselle CM, TAILLIE ER, Mayer R. A digital test for pelvic muscle strength in women with urinary incontinence. Nurs Res 1994;43:352‑6.
Yildirim G, Beji NK. Effects of pushing techniques in birth on mother and fetus: A randomized study. Birth 2008;35:25‑30.
Simpson KR, James DC. Effects of immediate versus delayed pushing during second-stage labor on fetal well-being: A randomized clinical trial. Nurs Res 2005;54:149‑57.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.