Ethical Considerations in Sexual Health Research: A Narrative Review

Maryam Shirmohammadi, Shahnaz Kohan, Ehsan Shamsi‑Gooshki, Mohsen Shahriari

Abstract


Background: There is an assumption that sexual health research has great influence on the quality of human life through elevating sexual health standards, and their results will eliminate the burden of sexual health challenges on family relationships. The aim of this study was to review ethical considerations in sexual health research.

Materials and Methods: This narrative review was conducted between January 1990 and December 2017 based on the five‑step approach of York University. The keywords used to search for the studies included ethical issues, research, sexual health, reproductive health, and sensitive topics. The language of the literatures was English and the search process was performed on Pub Med, Elsevier, Ovid, Springer, Google Scholar, Research Gate, SAGE Publishing, ProQuest, WHO website, Kinsey Confidential, and World sexology.

 Results: After assessing the quality and eligibility of 94 articles, 13 were selected. The results of the present study showed that the most important ethical considerations were protecting the confidentiality and privacy of participants, obtaining informed consent, and paying attention to vulnerable people.

 Conclusions: The review of literature exhibited several considerations that sexual health researchers are faced with. In order to manage these considerations, the researcher should have sufficient understanding of them. The important matter is that strategies to manage these challenges should be completely rational and practical according to each context. These strategies can also be applied in other societies with great similarities in their context.


Keywords


Ethics, research, sexual health

Full Text:

PDF

References


References

Sharifirad GF. Scientific misconduct: Self‑plagiarism [PERSIAN]. J Health Syst Res 2012;8:922‑8.

Tabei SZ, Mahmoodian F. Ethics in Research [PERSIAN]. Ethics Sci Technol 2007;2:49‑55.

Farhood D, Academic Ethics in Education and Research [PERSIAN]. Ethics Sci Technol 2010‑2011;5:1‑4.

Noland CM. Institutional barriers to research on sensitive topics: Case of sex communication research among university students. J Res Prac 2012;8:2.

Dickson‑Swift V. Doing sensitive research: What challenges do qualitative researchers face? Qual Res 2007;7:327‑53.

Draucker CB. The emotional impact of sexual violence research on participants. Arch Psychiatr Nurs 1999;13:161‑9.

Ford K, Norris A. Methodological considerations for survey research on sexual behavior: Urban African American and Hispanic youth. J Sex Res 1991;28:539‑55.

Crawford M, Popp D. Sexual double standards: A review and methodological critique of two decades of research. J Sex Res 2003;40:13‑26.

Harvey JH, Wenzel A, Sprecher S, The Handbook of Sexuality in Close Relationships. New York 2004, p. 31‑56.

McCusker J, Stoddard AM, Mayer KH, Zapka J, Morrison C, Saltzman SP. Effects of HIV antibody test knowledge on subsequent sexual behaviors in a cohort of homosexually active men. Am J Public Health 1988;78:462‑7.

Rahmani A, Merghati‑Khoei E, Moghaddam‑Banaem L, Zarei F, Montazeri A, Hajizadeh E. Sexuality research in Iran: A focus on methodological and ethical considerations. Iran J Public Health 2015;44:979.

Khan KS, Kunz R, Kleijnen J, Antes G. Five steps to conducting a systematic review. J R Soc Med 2003;96:118‑21.

Shahriari M, Mohammadi E, Abbaszadeh A, Bahrami M. Nursing ethical values and definitions: A literature review. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res 2013;18:1‑8.

Munro SA, Smith HJ, Engel ME, Fretheim A, Volmink J. Patient adherence to tuberculosis treatment: A systematic review of qualitative research. PLoS Med 2007;4:e238.

GuneE, Manuel S. Doing research on sexuality in Africa: Ethical dilemmas and the positioning of the researcher. African Sexualities: A reader. Pambazuka: Oxford; 2011.

Binik YM, Mah K, Kiesler S. Ethical issues in conducting sex research on the Internet. J Sex Res 1999;36:82‑90.

Flicker S, Guta A. Ethical approaches to adolescent participation in sexual health research. J Adolesc Health 2008;42:3‑10.

Coyle A, Wright C. Using the counselling interview to collect research data on sensitive topics. J Health Psychol 1996;1:431‑40.

Benbow SM, Haddad PM. Sexual abuse of the elderly mentally ill. Postgrad Med J 1993;69:803‑7.

Cowburn M. Confidentiality and public protection: Ethical dilemmas in qualitative research with adult male sex offenders. J Sexual Aggression 2005;11:49‑63.

Marshall A, Batten S. Ethical issues in cross‑cultural research. Connections 2003;3:139‑51.

James T, Platzer H. Ethical considerations in qualitative research with vulnerable groups: Exploring lesbians’ and gay men’s experiences of health care–A personal perspective. Nurs Ethics 1999;6:73‑81.

Cwikel J, Hoban E. Contentious issues in research on trafficked women working in the sex industry: Study design, ethics, and methodology. J Sex Res 2005;42:306‑16.

Meade MA, Slesnick N. Ethical considerations for research and treatment with runaway and homeless adolescents. J Psychol 2002;136:449‑63.

Seal DW, Bloom FR, Somlai AM. Dilemmas in conducting qualitative sex research in applied field settings. Health Educ Behav 2000;27:10‑23.

Gledhill SE, Abbey JA, Schweitzer R. Sampling methods: Methodological issues involved in the recruitment of older people into a study of sexuality. Aust J Adv Nurs 2008;26:84‑94.

Vanderpool HY. The ethics of research involving human subjects: Facing the 21st century. 1996. DOI :10.1056/ NEJM199703203361219.

Schulte P, Sweeney MH. Ethical considerations, confidentiality issues, rights of human subjects, and uses of monitoring data in research and regulation. Environ Health Perspect 1995;103:69.

Association AP, Association AP, American Psychiatric Association The Principles of Medical Ethics. 23th edition, 2013. Available at online: https://psychiatryonline.org/doi/pdf/10.1176/ appi.books.9780890 426760.

Mack R, Giarelli E, Bernhardt BA. The adolescent research participant: Strategies for productive and ethical interviewing. J Pediatr Nurs 2009;24:448‑57.

Rae WA, Sullivan JR, Razo NP, George CA, Ramirez E. Adolescent health risk behavior: When do pediatric psychologists break confidentiality? J Pediatr Psychol 2002;27:541‑9.

Folayan MO, Haire B, Harrison A, Odetoyingbo M, Fatusi O, Brown B. Ethical issues in adolescents’ sexual and reproductive health research in Nigeria. Dev World Bioeth 2015;15:191‑8.

Lothen‑Kline C, Howard DE, Hamburger EK, Worrell KD, Boekeloo BO. Truth and consequences: Ethics, confidentiality, and disclosure in adolescent longitudinal prevention research. J Adolesc Health 2003;33:385‑94.

Macrae DJ. The Council for International Organizations and Medical Sciences (CIOMS) guidelines on ethics of clinical trials. Pro Am Thorac Soc 2007;4:176‑9.

Singh JA, Karim SS, Karim QA, Mlisana K, Williamson C, Gray C, et al. Enrolling adolescents in research on HIV and other sensitive issues: Lessons from South Africa. PLoS Med 2006;3:e180.

Paterson BL, Gregory D, Thorne S. A protocol for researcher safety. Qual Health Res 1999;9:259‑69.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.