Evaluation of Ethical Attitude Approaches in Midwives and their Relationship with their Demographic Features

Narges Afhami, Nafisehsadat Nekuei, Parvin Bahadoran, HamidReza Taleghani‑Esfahani

Abstract


Background: Ethical approach is one of the paramount aspects of life. The position of this approach in medical occupations has always been noticed. This study was carried out to analyze the types of ethical approaches in midwives and their relationship with their demographic features.

Materials and Methods: The current descriptive‑correlation and cross‑sectional study was conducted from October to December 2014 using quota random sampling technique. The participants consisted of 189 midwives employed in Isfahan, Iran. The data collection tool was a researcher‑made questionnaire. The midwives’ attitudes were examined in the four fields of virtue ethics, deontologism, utilitarianism, and religious ethics. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics in SPSS software (p < 0.050).

Results: The highest score belonged to religious ethics with the mean value of 64.36 out of 100. A positive significant relationship was found between deontologism and education level (F = 8.74; p = 0.004), and total ethical approach and workplace (F = 2.60; p = 0.053). There was a reverse significant relationship between age and work experience and virtue ethics (r = −0.15; p = 0.035 and r = −0.20; p = 0.005, respectively).

Conclusions: The existing high percentage of religious ethics shows the religious tendency of the participants. The determination of ethical approach among midwives as one of the important medical groups and creation and improvement of the most appropriate attitude among them based on the present regulations and requirements in society are principles that we should attempt to achieve.


Keywords


Deontologism, midwifery, religious, utilitarianism, virtue ethics

Full Text:

PDF

References


Shomali MA, Momeni GH. Evaluation of Fundamental Ethical Theories and Principles of Medical Ethics. J Isfahan Med Sch 2013;31:1756‑68.

Anderson EE, Solomon S, Heitman E. Research Ethics Education for Community‑Engaged Research: A Review and Research Agenda. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2012;72:3‑19.

Ronzoni M. Teleology, Deontology, and the Priority of Right: On some unappreciated distinctions. Ethical Theory Moral Pract 2010;13:453‑72.

Kanekar A, Bitto A. Public health ethics related training for public health workforce: An emerging need in the United States. Iran J Public Health 2012;41:1‑8.

Farahani H, Rahjoonia M. The knowledge of Arak University of Medical Sciences students in medical religious commandments in, pre and post training. AMUJ 2010;12:63‑72.

Gensler HJ. Ethics: A Contemporary Introduction: 2nd ed. New York: Routledge Publication; 2012. pp 139‑54.

Horton K, Tschudin V, Forget A. The value of nursing: A literature review. Nursing Ethics 2007;14:716‑40.

Garbutt G, Davies P. Should the practice of medicine be a deontological or utilitarian enterprise? J Med Ethics 2011;37:267‑70.

Conway P, Gawronski B. Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: A process dissociation approach. J Pers Soc Psychol 2013;104:216‑35.

de Groot J, van Hoek M, Hoedemaekers C, Hoitsma A, Smeets W, Vernooij‑Dassen M, et al. Decision making on organ donation: The dilemmas of relatives of potential brain dead donors. BMC Med Ethics 2015;16:64.

Borhani F, Abbaszadeh A, Nakhaee N. The relationship between moral distress, professional stress, and intent to stay in the nursing profession. J Med Ethics Hist Med 2014;18:71‑4.

Azimi N, Kiani M, Ahmadi M. Awareness of midwifery ‘students, medical interns women and gynecologist students about medical ethics standards in department of labor, chosen hospitals training of Tehran. Med Ethics J 2013;7:51‑69.

Klingberg‑Allvin M, Van Tam V, Nga NT. Ethics of justice and ethics of care. Values and attitudes among midwifery students on adolescent sexuality and abortion in Vietnam and their implications for midwifery education: A survey by questionnaire and interview. Int J Nurs Stud 2007;44:37‑46.

Özcan M, Akpinar A, Ergin AB. Personal and professional values grading among midwifery students. Nurs Ethics 2012;19:399‑407.

Salehi T, Dehghan Nayeri N, Negarandeh R. Ethics: Patients’ Rights and the Code of Nursing Ethics in Iran. OJIN 2010;15:40‑3.

Borhani F, Keshtgar M, Abbaszadeh A. Moral self‑concept and moral sensitivity in Iranian nurses; J Med Ethics His Med 2015;8:1‑7.

Kathryn W, Janice M, Carl M. Ethical sensitivity in professional practice. JAN 2008;62:607‑18


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.