The Process of Deciding Mother’s Role for Preparing Children as Part of an Online Sexual Crime Free Digital Society: A Grounded Theory

Nurmukaromatis Saleha, Desi Andreswari, Titin Aprilatutini, Nurlaili Nurlaili, Encik Putri Ema Komala

Abstract


Background: In this technological era, there is a serious global threat to child development, the phenomenon of child sexual abuse via the internet (Internet Child Sexual Abuse/ICSA), and mothers must adapt to the era’s needs. The purpose of this study is to explore the decision‑making process regarding the role of mothers in protecting their children from sexual harassment in the digital age.

Materials and Methods: A grounded theory approach was used in Bengkulu, Indonesia, in 2021. Data were obtained through focus group discussions on 12 mothers, 4 girls, and 4 female activists (who were selected by theoretical sampling), which were analyzed using thematic analysis. Memos were generated after categorical analysis was sorted after saturation occurred.

Results: Five theoretical categories formed the core category. The five categories of the theory were “mother’s views on sexual education in children,” “strategies for sexual communication with children,” “the negative impact of online media,” “limits in carrying out supervision,” and “preparation needed by children.” The memo was drawn theoretically, “new challenges in parenting,” which was then made into a core category. The core category was “preparing children to be part of a sex crime‑free digital society.”

Conclusions: Parents teach their kids self‑control, awareness, and the importance of using virtual media wisely and selectively. The parenting and technology recommendations assist mothers in protecting their children from internet‑based sexual crimes. Maternity nurses should promote reproductive health through the creation of relevant media.



Keywords


Child, female, Indonesia, internet, parenting

Full Text:

PDF

References


Katz C, Piller S, Glucklich T, Matty DE. Stop waking the dead’: Internet child sexual abuse and perspectives on its disclosure. JInterpers Violence 2021;36:NP5084 104.

Simon J, Luetzow A, Conte JR. Thirty years of the convention on the rights of the child: Developments in child sexual abuse and exploitation. Child Abuse Negl 2020;110:104399.

Zahirah U, Nurwati N, Krisnani H. Dampak dan penanganan kekerasan seksual anak di keluarga. Pros Penelit Dan Pengabdi Kpd Masy 2019;6:10. doi: 10.24198/jppm.v6i1.21793.

Sumaryani S, Ningrum SAW, Prihatiningsih TS, Haryanti F, Gunadi A. Peer education and sexual risk behavior among adolescents: Does urban status matter?. Open Access Maced J MedSci 2021;9:50 4.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No 20 Tahun 2003, Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. 2003. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2003 Nomor 4301. Jakarta.

Adawiyah, Pola asuh orang tua dan implikasinya terhadap pendidikan anak (Studi pada Masyarakat Dayak di Kecamatan Halong Kabupaten Balangan), Open Science Framework, preprint, 2020. doi: 10.31219/osf.io/4cjy.

Sari DK. Pola asuh orang tua pada anak yang berperilaku agresif (Studi Deskriptif Kuantitatif Di TK Tunas Harapan Sawah Lebar Kota Bengkulu), 2018;3:6.

CharmazK, Thornberg R. The pursuit of quality in grounded theory. Qual ResPsychol 2021;18:305 27.

Jaberi A, Momennasab J. The process of promoting spiritual health in Iranian muslim adults: A grounded theory. Iran JNurs Midwifery Res 2021;26:104.

Chun Tie Y, Birks M, Francis K. Grounded theory research: A design framework for novice researchers. SAGE Open Med 2019;7:205031211882292.doi: 10.1177/2050312118822927.

Amaliyah S, Nuqul FL. Eksplorasi Persepsi Ibu tentang Pendidikan Seks untuk Anak,” Psympathic J. Ilm. Psikol. 2017;4:157 66. doi: 10.15575/psy.v4i2.1758.

Creswell John W.Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif Dan Mixed. 1st ed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar; 2010.

Djufri MAP, Posangi J, Oroh W. Hubungan pola asuh orang tua dengan pemberian pendidikan seks pada anak di kelas 5 dan 6 SD Inpres Boyong Pante J. Keperawatan 2019;7. doi: 10.35790/ jkp.v7i1.22899.

Shams M, Parhizkar S, Mousavizadeh A, MajdpourM. Mothers’ views about sexual health education for their adolescent daughters: A qualitative study. Reprod Health 2017;14:24.

Nadar W. Persepsi orang tua mengenai pendidikan seks untuk anak usia dini, Jurnal Pendidikan Usia Dini 2017;2:14.

Saleha N, Yustisia RDN, Aprilatutini T. Sosialisasi Program Undewear Rules untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Melindungi Diri pada Anak Prasekolah 2021;4:12.

Steinfeld N. Internet safety education: How we educate our girls to beware of others, and our boys to beware of themselves. AoIR Sel Pap Internet Res 2019.doi: 10.5210/spir.v2019i0.11040.

Soedarto J. Kecanduan smartphone ditinjau dari kontrol diri dan jenis kelamin pada siswa SMA Mardisiswa Semarang. 2018;7:10.

Mumbaasithoh L, Ulya FM, Rahmat KB. Kontrol Diri dan Kecanduan Gadget pada Siswa Remaja, J. Penelit. Psikol 2021;12:33 42.

Choi KS, Lee SS, Lee JR. Mobile phone technology and online sexual harassment among juveniles in South Korea: Effects of self control and social learning.Int J Cyber Criminol 2017;11:110 27.

Debora N.Sukmawati I. The relationship of self control to students gadget use. J Neo Konseling 2021;3:5.

Ryckman LF, Guerra C, Finch A. Strategies to prevent online sexual abuse of children. SocSciProtoc 2020;3:1 7.

AbduhM, Wulandari MD. Model pendidikan seks pada anak sekolah dasar berbasis teori perkembangan anak, The Progressive and Fun Education Seminar Anak. 2016. p.. 9.

Mukri SG. Pendidikan Seks Usia Dini Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam, Mizan J. Islam Law 2018;3.doi: 10.32507/mizan.v3i1.153.

WajdiF, Arif A. Pentingnya pendidikan seks bagi anak sebagai upaya pemahaman dan menghindari pencegahan kekerasan maupun kejahatan seksual, J. Abdimas Indones 2021;1:129 37. doi: 10.53769/jai.v1i3.130.

Dolev Cohen M, Ricon T. Demystifying sexting: Adolescent sexting and its associations with parenting styles and sense of parental social control in Israel. Cyberpsychol J Psychosoc Res Cyberspace 2020;14.doi: 10.5817/CP2020 1 6.

Murphy DM, Spencer B. Teens’ experiences with sexting: A grounded theory study. JPediatr Health Care 2021;35:387 400.

AventinÁ, Gough A, McShane T, Gillespie K, O’Hare L, Young H, et al. Engaging parents in digital sexual and reproductive health education: Evidence from the JACK trial. Reprod Health 2020;17:132.

Cronin C, Sood S, Thomas D. From innovation to transcreation: Adapting digital technologies to address violence against children: Adapting digital technologies. Child Abuse Rev 2017;26:215 29.

Setiyaningsih LA, Fahmi MH, Molyo PD. Selective exposure media sosial pada ibu dan perilaku anti sosialanak. J Komun Nusant 2021;3:1 11.

Woodhams J, Kloess JA, Jose B, Hamilton Giachritsis CE. Characteristics and behaviors of anonymous users of dark web platforms suspected of child sexual offenses. FrontPsychol2021;12:623668.

Davidson J, Gottschalk P. Characteristics of the internet for criminal child sexual abuse by online groomers. Crim Justice Stud 2011;24:23 36.

Quayle E, Newman E. An exploratory study of public reports to investigate patterns and themes of requests for sexual images of minors online. Crime Sci 2016;5:2.

Wood C, Wheatcroft JM. Young adult perceptions of internet communications and the grooming concept. SAGE Open 2020;10:215824402091457.doi: 10.1177/2158244020914573.

York L, MacKenzie A, PurdyN. Sexting and institutional discourses of child protection: The views of young people and providers of relationship and sex education. BrEduc Res J 2021;47:1717–34.

ÖzçalıkK, Atakoğlu R. Online child sexual abuse: Prevalence and characteristics of the victims and offenders. J Psychiatr Nurs 2021;12:76 81.

Eaton A, McGlynn C. The psychology of nonconsensual porn: Understanding and addressing a growing form of sexual violence. Policy Insights Behav Brain Sci 2020;7:190 7.

Taylor EK, Slemaker A, Silovsky JF. Professionals’ perceptions of electronic and online sexual behaviors of youth in their community. Child Youth Serv Rev 2020;111:104831.

Netkova B. International legal standards in combating child online sexual abuse and exploitation. J Lib Int AffInst Res Eur Stud Bitola 2021;6:111 22.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.