The Role of Electronic Health Tools in Unwanted Pregnancy Prevention, Abortion and Post Abortion Follow Up: A Systematic Review

Seyedeh Nafiseh Shahrokhi, Hosna Salmani, Maryam Ahmadi

Abstract


Background: More than 30% of women experience at least one abortion. To date, there has been no comprehensive mobile health project on the impact of technology on access to abortion, contraception, and post‑abortion follow‑up. The purpose of this study was to review published studies on the role of electronic health in the prevention of unwanted pregnancy, abortion, and post‑abortion follow‑up.

Materials and Methods: The Web of Science, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and EMBASE databases were searched to find relevant articles published between 2008 and 2018. A systematic review study was conducted on 33 relevant articles. All studies related to the use and impact of electronic health on unwanted pregnancy prevention, abortion and post‑abortion follow‑up in English from January 2008 to December 2018 were included. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the PRISMA‑S. Results: Thirty‑three studies met the inclusion criteria for the review. The Studies were divided into four main groups of women’s experiences on the use of mobile health and telemedicine technologies for at‑home medical abortion, unwanted pregnancy prevention, abortion, and post‑abortion follow‑up. The results showed the significant impact of using electronic health on unwanted pregnancy prevention, abortion, and post‑abortion follow‑up.

Conclusions: Health technologies have the potential to be used as a low‑cost and accessible method to replace abortion services. They can facilitate remote care and quick access to information to complete the gaps in access to abortion. Therefore, it is necessary for health service providers to be aware of the possibility of the client’s access to electronic health tools.

Highlights
Maryam Ahmadi: PubMed, Google Scholar


Keywords


Induced abortion, pregnancy, technology, telemedicine

Full Text:

PDF

References


Momberg M, Harries J, Constant D. Self assessment of eligibility for early medical abortion using m Health to calculate gestational age in Cape Town, South Africa: A feasibility pilot study. Reprod Health 2016;13:54 9.

Smith C, Ngo TD, Gold J, Edwards P, Vannak U, Sokhey L, et al. Effect of a mobile phone based intervention on post abortion contraception: A randomized controlled trial in Cambodia. Bull World Health Organ 2015;93:842 50A.

Mangone ER, Lebrun V. Mobile phone apps for the prevention of unintended pregnancy: A systematic review and content analysis. Jmir M health and U health 2016;4:154 64.

Aiken ARA, Digol I, Trussell J, Gomperts R. Self reported outcomes and adverse events after medical abortion through online telemedicine: Population based study in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland. BMJ 2017;12:357 8.

Gill R, Norman WV. Telemedicine and medical abortion: Dispelling safety myths, with facts. MHealth 2018;4:3.

Fok WK, Mark A. Abortion through telemedicine. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2018;30:394 9.

Norman WV, Dickens BM. Abortion by telemedicine: An equitable option for Irish women. BMJ 2017;357:j2237.

Biswas KK, Hossain A, Chowdhury R, Andersen K, Sultana S, Shahidullah S, et al. Using mHealth to support postabortion contraceptive use: Results from a feasibility study in urban Bangladesh. JMIR Form Res 2017;1:e4.

Bracken H, Lohr PA, Taylor J, Morroni C, Winikoff B. RU OK? The acceptability and feasibility of remote technologies for follow up after early medical abortion. Contraception 2014;90:29 35.

Constant D, de Tolly K, Harries J, Myer L. Assessment of completion of early medical abortion using a text questionnaire on mobile phones compared to a self administered paper questionnaire among women attending four clinics, Cape Town, South Africa. Reprod Health Matters 2015;22:83 93.

Aiken A, Gomperts R, Trussell J. Experiences and characteristics of women seeking and completing at home medical termination of pregnancy through online telemedicine in Ireland and Northern Ireland: A population based analysis. BJOG 2017;124:1208 15.

Les K, Gomperts R, Gemzell Danielsson K. Experiences of women living in Hungary seeking a medical abortion online. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2017;22:360 2.

Aiken ARA, Johnson DM, Broussard K, Padron E. Experiences of women in Ireland who accessed abortion by travelling abroad or by using abortion medication at home: A qualitative study. BMJ Sex Reprod Health 2018;44:181 6.

Grindlay K, Lane K, Grossman D. Women’s and providers’ experiences with medical abortion provided through telemedicine: A qualitative study. Womens Health Issues 2013;23:e117 22.

McKay RJ, Rutherford L. Women’s satisfaction with early home medical abortion with telephone follow up: A questionnaire based study in the UK. J Obstet Gynaecol 2013;33:601 4.

Smith C, Ly S, Uk V, Warnock R, Free C. Women’s views and experiences of a mobile phone based intervention to support post abortion contraception in Cambodia. Reprod Health 2017;14:72.

Constant D, de Tolly K, Harries J, Myer L. Mobile phone messages to provide support to women during the home phase of medical abortion in South Africa: A randomised controlled trial. Contraception 2014;90:226 33.

Reiss K, Andersen K, Barnard S, Ngo TD, Biswas K, Smith C, et al. Using automated voice messages linked to telephone counselling to increase post-menstrual regulation contraceptive uptake and continuation in Bangladesh: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health 2017;17:769.

Smith C, Jarvis C, Free C. Assessing loss to follow up in the MObile Technology for Improved Family Planning (MOTIF) randomised controlled trial. Trials 2017;18:74 8.

McCarthy OL, Wazwaz O, Jado I, Leurent B, Edwards P, Adada S, et al. An intervention delivered by text message to increase the acceptability of effective contraception among young women in Palestine: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial 2017;18:520-27.

Smith C, Gold J, Ngo TD, Sumpter C, Free C. Mobile phone-based interventions for improving contraception use. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;2015:CD011159.

Cameron ST, Glasier A, Dewart H, Johnstone A, Burnside A. Telephone follow-up and self-performed urine pregnancy testing after early medical abortion: A service evaluation. Contraception 2012;86:67-73.

Smith C, Vannak U, Sokhey L, Ngo TD, Gold J, Khut K, et al. MObile Technology for Improved Family Planning Services (MOTIF): Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2013;14:143 7.

Smith C. Process evaluation of a mobile phone based intervention to support post abortion contraception in Cambodia. Contracept Reprod Med 2017;2:16.

Grossman DA, Grindlay K, Buchacker T, Potter JE, Schmertmann CP. Changes in service delivery patterns after introduction of telemedicine provision of medical abortion in Iowa. Am J Public Health 2013;103:73-8.

Hyland P, Raymond EG, Chong E. A direct-to-patient telemedicine abortion service in Australia: Retrospective analysis of the first 18 months. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2018;58:335-40.

Constant D, de Tolly K, Harries J, Myer L. Mobile phone messages to provide support to women during the home phase of medical abortion in South Africa: A randomised controlled trial. Contraception 2014;90:226-33.

Dunn S, Panjwani D, Gupta M, Meaney C, Morgan R, Feuerstein E. Comparison of remote and in-clinic follow-up after methotrexate/misoprostol abortion. Contraception 2015;92:220-6.

Steinberg A, Griffin Tomas M, Abu Odeh D, Whitten A. Evaluation of a mobile phone app for providing adolescents with sexual and reproductive health information, New York City, 2013 2016. Public Health Rep 2018;133:233 9.

Endler M, Beets L, Gemzell Danielsson K, Gomperts R. Safety and acceptability of medical abortion through telemedicine after 9 weeks of gestation: A population-based cohort study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2019;126:609-18.

Gomperts R, van der Vleuten K, Jelinska K, da Costa CV, Gemzell Danielsson K, Kleiverda G. Provision of medical abortion using telemedicine in Brazil. Contraception 2014;89:129 33.

Messinger CJ, Mahmud I, Kanan S, Jahangir YT, Sarker M, Rashid SF. Utilization of mobile phones for accessing menstrual regulation services among low income women in Bangladesh: A qualitative analysis. Reprod Health 2017;14:7.

Leidich A, Jayaweera R, Arcara J, Clawson S, Chalker C, Rochat R. Evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of sending pregnancy and abortion history surveys through SMS text messaging to help reach sustainable development goal 3. Int J Med Inform 2018;114:108-13.

de Tolly KM, Constant D. Integrating mobile phones into medical abortion provision: Intervention Development, use, and lessons learned from a randomized controlled trial. JMIR MHealth UHealth 2014;2:e5.

Grossman D, Grindlay K, Buchacker T, Lane K, Blanchard K. Effectiveness and acceptability of medical abortion provided through telemedicine. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:296 303.

Aiken ARA, Guthrie KA, Schellekens M, Trussell J, Gomperts R. Barriers to accessing abortion services and perspectives on using mifepristone and misoprostol at home in Great Britain. Contraception 2018;97:177-83.

Gomperts RJ, Jelinska K, Davies S, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Kleiverda G. Using telemedicine for termination of pregnancy with mifepristone and misoprostol in settings where there is no. access to safe services. BJOG 2008;115:1171-5.

Cameron ST, Glasier A, Dewart H, Johnstone A, Burnside A. Telephone follow-up and self-performed urine pregnancy testing after early medical abortion: A service evaluation. Contraception 2012;86:67-73.

Grossman D, Grindlay K. Safety of medical abortion provided through telemedicine compared with in person. Obstet Gynecol 2017;130:778 82.

Smith C, Vannak U, Sokhey L, Ngo TD, Gold J, Free C. Mobile Technology for Improved Family Planning (MOTIF): The development of a mobile phone-based (mHealth) intervention to support post-abortion family planning (PAFP) in Cambodia. Reprod Health 2016;13:1.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.