Developing and Validating a Questionnaire to Measure Attitude toward Child Adoption: A Psychometric Process

Masumeh Ghazanfarpour, Shirin Aminizadeh, Katayoun Alidousti, Mahlegha Dehghan, Atefeh Ahmadi

Abstract


Background: Despite the mutual benefit of adoption, due to the adverse attitude related to the barriers perceived by the couples, some people are not interested in adoption. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a questionnaire to measure attitudes toward child adoption.

Materials and Methods: This secondary analysis is part of a larger study on 178 infertile couples referring to the Afzalipour Infertility Center in Kerman, Iran. Factor Analysis (FA) was performed. The sampling was conducted using the convenience sampling method. The questionnaire was implemented using a mixed‑method approach in three phases. Firstly, a pool was created. The second phase involved content validity. Lastly, construct validity was conducted.

Results: The final version of the questionnaire with 20 questions had a total Cronbach’s alpha of 0.70%. Six factors with eigenvalues of higher than 1.00 were extracted, which accounted for 52% of the total variance. These factors were “spiritual–psychological status of the new parents,” “psychological status of the adopted child,” “undesirable behaviors of others in the future,” “anxiety of the new parents,” “physical–behavioral characteristics of the adopted child,” and “socio‑economic factors.” The model extracted from the Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was confirmed by Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). The 6‑factor structure adequately fitted the data (Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.93; root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.047; X2 /df = 1.393; p = 0.002.

Conclusions: The internal consistency and construct validity of the questionnaire were confirmed. This instrument can be used in clinical and research practices.

 


Keywords


Adoption, attitude, infertility, instruments, Iran, psychometric

Full Text:

PDF

References


Maharlouei N, Behbahani BM, Doryanizadeh L, Kazemi M. Prevalence and pattern of infertility in Iran: A systematic review and meta analysis study. WHB 2021;8:63 71 .

Garcia C. Replacing foster care with family care: The family first prevention services act of 2018. Fam Law Q 2019;53:27 49.

Rezvanimofrad A, Zafari M. Evolution in the law system of protecting unsupervised children. J Civ Law Knowl, 2016:4:23-35.

Akhondi MM, Ranjbar F, Shirzad M, Behjati Ardakani Z, Kamali K, Mohammad K. Practical difficulties in estimating the prevalence of primary infertility in Iran. Int J Fertil Steril 2019;13:113 7.

Mohanty J. Attitudes toward adoption in Singapore. J Fam Issues 2014;35:705 28.

Joshi S, Prasad R, Kushwaha A. A study of knowledge and attitude towards adoption amongst infertile couples. Int J Public Health Res 2015;3:318 26.

Naylor L. Increasing Adoption and Reducing the Number of Children in Foster Care in the U.S. and Abroad. Retrieved 2013 . Available form: http://hdl.handle.net/11603/8775. [Last accessed on 2023 May 16].

Hajiyan T, Afshari P, Abedi MR, Hashemi E. Investigating infertility related stress and adoption in Iranian infertile females with assisted reproductive technology failure. Jundishapur J Chronic Dis Care 2017;6:e39632.

Nachinab GT E., Donkor ES, Naab F. Perceived barriers of child adoption: A qualitative study among women with infertility in Northern Ghana. BioMed Res Int 2019;2019:6140285.

Hasanpoor Azgahdy SB, Simbar M, Vedadhir A, Farahani LA. Exploring the challenge of adoption from the perspective of Iranian infertile women. J Client Centered Nurs Care 2016;2:19 26.

Mia MM, Majri Y, Rahman IKA. Covariance based structural equation modeling (CB SEM) using AMOS in management research. J Busi Manage 2019;21:56 61.

Ghazali NM, Rabi N, Wahab N, Rohaizad NA. Development and validation of an inventory to evaluate teaching strategies for promoting higher order thinking skills in the teaching of Islamic education. Ta’dib 2017;22:39 47.

Straehl J, Lara LADS, Sá MFS, Reis RM, Rosa E Silva ACJS. What do infertile women think about oocyte reception, oocyte donation, and child adoption? Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2017;39:282 7.

Van Laningham JL, Scheuble LK, Johnson DR. Social factors predicting women’s consideration of adoption. Mich Fam Rev 2012;16:1 21.

Paine AL, Fahey K, Anthony RE, Shelton KH. Early adversity predicts adoptees’ enduring emotional and behavioral problems in childhood. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2021;30:721 32.

Walkner AJ, Rueter MA. Adoption status and family relationships during the transition to young adulthood. J Fam Psychology 2014;28:877 86.

Robinson SA. Adoption Anxiety Among Prospective Adoptive Parents. Las Vegas: University of Nevada; 1995.

Roszia S, Maxon AD. Seven Core Issues in Adoption and Permanency: A Comprehensive Guide to Promoting Understanding and Healing in Adoption, Foster Care, Kinship Families and Third Party Reproduction. Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 2019.

Bornstein, M.H. (Ed.). (. Handbook of Parenting: Volume I: Children and Parenting, Third Edition (3rd ed.). Routledge 2019; 1-10. Available form: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429440847. [Last accessed on 2023 May 16].

Dalen M, Theie S, Rygvold A L. School adjustment of internationally adopted children in primary school: A mother and teacher approach. Child Youth Serv Rev 2020;109:104737.

Baptista NM, Christensen KD, Carere DA, Broadley SA, Roberts JS, Green RC. Adopting genetics: Motivations and outcomes of personal genomic testing in adult adoptees. Genet Med 2016;18:924 32.

Onayemi OM, Aderinto AA. Child adoption investigation in Nigeria: Challenges and options. Niger J Sociol Anthropol 2019;15:87 100.

Onayemi OM, Aderinto AA. The significance of malpractice claims in the management of child adoption demands in Southwest Nigeria. Cogent Soc Sci 2019;5:1696002.

van Doorn Klomberg AL, Braspenning JC, Feskens RC, Bouma M, Campbell SM, Reeves D. Precision of individual and composite performance scores: The ideal number of indicators in an indicator set. Med Care 2013;51:115 21.

King PA. Replicability of structural models of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in a community sample of postpartum African American women with low socioeconomic status. Arch Womens Ment Health 2012;15:77 86.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.