Comparison of Mannequin Based Simulation Training Method with Virtual Training Method on Nursing Students’ Learning Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Controlled Randomized Parallel Trial

Mohammad Abbasi, Yousef Asadoola, Hossein Ebrahimi, Elahe Bahonar, Zinab Dabirian, Seyed‑Mahdi Esmaeili, Ahmad Mahdizadeh, Mahdi Sadeghi

Abstract


Background: The use of different educational methods and programs, such as simulation and virtual training, plays an important role in effective Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) learning for nursing students. This study was conducted with the aim of comparing mannequin‑based simulation training with virtual training on CPR learning among nursing students.

Materials and Methods: This parallel randomized controlled trial was conducted in 2022. We selected 73 nursing undergraduate students and randomly assigned them to two groups: mannequin‑based simulation and virtual training groups. The knowledge, attitude, and performance of CPR in both groups were evaluated and compared before, immediately after, and 1 month after the intervention. Data analysis was performed using independent t‑test and the repeated‑measure analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software.

Results: Within‑group differences were significant in both mannequin‑based simulation and virtual training groups in terms of knowledge, attitude, and CPR performance before and after training, as well as between before and 1 month after training (p < 0.001). In addition, the mean performance of simulation group students was significantly higher than the virtual group (p < 0.001), but no significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of knowledge and attitude dimensions before training, after training, and 1 month after training.

Conclusions: Both mannequin‑based simulation and virtual training methods increase CPR learning. Considering that students’ knowledge and attitude increase significantly using both training methods and the performance of students in the simulation group is better than in the virtual group, the use of a multimodal approach is recommended for CPR training of nursing students.



Keywords


Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, education, nursing, simulation training

Full Text:

PDF

References


Demirtas A, Guvenc G, Aslan Ö, Unver V, Basak T, Kaya C. Effectiveness of simulation based cardiopulmonary resuscitation training programs on fourth year nursing students. Australasn Emerg Care 2021;24:4 10.

Merchant RM, Topjian AA, Panchal AR, Cheng A, Aziz K, Berg KM, et al. Part 1: Executive summary: 2020 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 2020;142(suppl_2):S337 57.

Panchal AR, Bartos JA, Cabañas JG, Donnino MW, Drennan IR, Hirsch KG, et al. Part 3: Adult basic and advanced life support: 2020 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 2020;142(suppl_2):S366 468.

Sullivan NJ, Duval Arnould J, Twilley M, Smith SP, Aksamit D, Boone Guercio P, et al. Simulation exercise to improve retention of cardiopulmonary resuscitation priorities for in hospital cardiac arrests: A randomized controlled trial. Resuscitation 2015;86:6 13.

Oermann MH, Kardong Edgren SE, Odom Maryon T. Effects of monthly practice on nursing students’ CPR psychomotor skill performance. Resuscitation 2011;82:447 53.

Abella BS. The importance of cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality. Curr Opin Crit Care 2013;19:175 80.

Chamberlain DA, Hazinski MF. Education in resuscitation. Resuscitation 2003;59:11 43.

Pivač S, Gradišek P, Skela Savič B. The impact of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training on schoolchildren and their CPR knowledge, attitudes toward CPR, and willingness to help others and to perform CPR: Mixed methods research design. BMC Public Health 2020;20:915.

Olasveengen TM, Mancini ME, Perkins GD, Avis S, Brooks S, Castrén M, et al. Adult basic life support: 2020 International consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations. Circulation 2020;142(suppl_1):S41 91.

Madden C. Undergraduate nursing students’ acquisition and retention of CPR knowledge and skills. Nurs Educ Today 2006;26:218 27.

Mohsen pour m, Imani z, Abdolkarimi M. The effect of education of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (C.P.R) on knowledge of nursing staff and C.P.R team members in a hospital in Kerman province. J Qual Res Health Sci 2010;09:1 7. (In Persian).

Roel S, Bjørk IT. Comparing nursing student competence in CPR before and after a pedagogical intervention. Nurs Res Pract 2020;2020:7459084.

Babanazari Z, Mansouri P, Amini M, Zare N, Raiesi H. Comparison of the effects of cardiopulmonary resuscitation training through modified team based learning and traditional method on knowledge and skills of nursing students in the College of Nursing and Midwifery, Shiraz, 2012. J Nurs Edu 2017;6:8 16. (In Persian).

Kim SS, Roh YS. Status of cardiopulmonary resuscitation curricula for nursing students: A questionnaire study. Nurs Health Sci 2016;18:496 502.

Baldi E, Contri E, Bailoni A, Rendic K, Turcan V, Donchev N, et al. Final year medical students’ knowledge of cardiac arrest and CPR: We must do more! Int J Cardiol 2019;296:76 80.

Chandrasekaran S, Kumar S, Bhat SA, Saravanakumar, Shabbir PM, Chandrasekaran V. Awareness of basic life support among medical, dental, nursing students and doctors. Indian J Anaesth 2010;54:121 6.

Cason CL, Baxley SM. Learning CPR with the BLS anytimeTM for healthcare provider’s kit. Clin Simul Nurs 2011;7:e237 43.

Husebø SE, Friberg F, Søreide E, Rystedt H. Instructional problems in briefings: How to prepare nursing students for simulation based cardiopulmonary resuscitation training. Clin Simul Nurs 2012;8:e307 18.

Zhonggen Y. A meta analysis of use of serious games in education over a decade. Int J Comput Games Technol 2019;2019:4797032.

Sanford PG. Simulation in nursing education: A review of the research. Qual Rep 2010;15:1006.

Beck CT. How students perceive faculty caring: A phenomenological study. Nurse Educ 1991;16:18 22.

Farsi Z, Yazdani M, Butler S, Nezamzadeh M, Mirlashari J. Comparative effectiveness of simulation versus serious game for training nursing students in cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A randomized control trial. Int J Comput Games Technol 2021;2021:6695077.

Shearer R, Davidhizar R. Using role play to develop cultural competence. J Nurs Educ 2003;42:273 6.

Aqel AA, Ahmad MM. High fidelity simulation effects on CPR knowledge, skills, acquisition, and retention in nursing students. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2014;11:394 400.

McCoy CE, Rahman A, Rendon JC, Anderson CL, Langdorf MI, Lotfipour S, et al. Randomized controlled trial of simulation vs. standard training for teaching medical students high quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation. West J Emerg Med 2019;20:15 22.

Semeraro F, Ristagno G, Giulini G, Gnudi T, Kayal JS, Monesi A, et al. Virtual reality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR): Comparison with a standard CPR training mannequin. Resuscitation 2019;135:234 5.

Semeraro F, Scapigliati A, Ristagno G, Luciani A, Gandolfi S, Lockey A, et al. Virtual reality for CPR training: How cool is that? Dedicated to the “next generation”. Resuscitation 2017;121:e1 2.

Means B, Toyama Y, Murphy R, Bakia M, Jones K. Evaluation of Evidence based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. US Department of Education; 2009. Available from: https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/ eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf.

Nas J, Thannhauser J, Konijnenberg LSF, van Geuns R JM, van Royen N, Bonnes JL, et al. Long term effect of face to face vs virtual reality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training on willingness to perform CPR, retention of knowledge, and dissemination of CPR awareness: A secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Network Open 2022;5:e2212964 e.

Nicolaidou I, Antoniades A, Constantinou R, Marangos C, Kyriacou E, Bamidis P, et al. A virtual emergency telemedicine serious game in medical training: A quantitative, professional feedback informed evaluation study. J Med Internet Res 2015;17:e150.

Cheng A, Duff JP, Kessler D, Tofil NM, Davidson J, Lin Y, et al. Optimizing CPR performance with CPR coaching for pediatric cardiac arrest: A randomized simulation based clinical trial. Resuscitation 2018;132:33 40.

Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A G. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods 2009;41:1149 60.

Dick W, Carey L. Instructor’s Manual for the Systematic Design of Instruction: Scott, Foresman and Company; 1978.

Akhu Zaheya LM, Gharaibeh MK, Alostaz ZM. Effectiveness of Simulation on knowledge acquisition, knowledge retention, and self efficacy of nursing students in Jordan. Clin Simul Nurs 2013;9:e335 42.

Bazrafkan L, Kojuri J, yarmahmodi f, zahadatpour z, Razavinejad SM, Bahrami R, et al. Evaluation of the effectiveness of training by simulation and reporting in small groups on the performance of the neonatal resuscitation team. Educ Dev Judishapur 2022;13:160 8.

Hamilton R. Nurses’ knowledge and skill retention following cardiopulmonary resuscitation training: A review of the literature. J Adv Nurs 2005;51:288 97.

Akbari Farmad S, Khoshnoodi far M, Rezaee M, Farajpour A. The effect of simulation based cardiopulmonary resuscitation training on knowledge and clinical skills of nurses in Baharloo Hospital. Educ Dev Judishapur 2021;12:511 20. (Persian).

Takhdat K, Eddabbah M, El Hamzaoui H, Lamtali S, El Adib AR. High fidelity simulation effects on cardiopulmonary resuscitation self efficacy and knowledge retention in undergraduate nursing students: A two group, experimental, longitudinal pilot study. Nurs Educ Perspect 2022;43:E118 20.

Heidarzadeh A, Kazemi M, Forouzi M, jahani Y. Comparing the effect of two methods of cardiopulmonary resuscitation education including computer based stimulation and mannequin stimulation on nursing students knowledge and satisfaction. Journal of Medical Education Development 2015;8:12 20. (Persian).

Onan A, Simsek N, Elcin M, Turan S, Erbil B, Deniz KZ. A review of simulation enhanced, team based cardiopulmonary resuscitation training for undergraduate students. Nurse Educ Pract 2017;27:134 43.

Dyrstad DN, Bodsberg KG, Søiland M, Bergesen ÅU, Urstad KH. Value of simulating holistic nursing care: A quantitative study. Clin Simul Nurs 2021;54:113 20.

Farzaneh R, Baharfar A, Rahimaghaee F, Ahmadnezhad S. Virtual cardiopulmonary resuscitation training during the COVID 19 Crisis? . Updates Emerg Med 2022;2.

Nas J, Thannhauser J, Vart P, van Geuns RJ, Muijsers HEC, Mol JQ, et al. Effect of face to face vs virtual reality training on cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol 2020;5:328 35.

Kuyt K, Park S H, Chang TP, Jung T, MacKinnon R. The use of virtual reality and augmented reality to enhance cardio pulmonary resuscitation: A scoping review. Adv Simul (Lond) 2021;6:11.

Alcázar Artero PM, Pardo Rios M, Greif R, Ocampo Cervantes AB, Gijón Nogueron G, Barcala Furelos R, et al. Efficiency of virtual reality for cardiopulmonary resuscitation training of adult laypersons: A systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2023;102:e32736.

Buttussi F, Chittaro L, Valent F. A virtual reality methodology for cardiopulmonary resuscitation training with and without a physical mannequin. J Biomed Inform 2020;111:103590.

Farmad S, Yosefian F. Evaluation of the effectiveness of virtual CPR training in midwives of Shahid Hasheminezhad Hospital in Mashhad. mededj 2022;10:7 16. (Persian).

Jalili E, Niazi S, khanlarzade E, Salimi R. Comparison of two methods of face to face training and virtual training in learning advanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation concepts among emergency department interns. Res Med Educ 2022;14:58 65. (Persian).


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.