Health Information Disorders Models: A Scoping Review
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this scoping review is to identify the models of Health Information Disorders (HIDs), the components of these models, their study setting, and their designing approaches.
Materials and Methods: In this study, PubMed, Web Of Science (WOS), Scopus, ProQuest, and Embase databases were searched to identify relevant articles. After screening the identified studies, 22 studies were selected. Data was extracted based on objectives and was combined and summarized by a narrative method.
Results: The analysis of articles showed most of the included studies presented conceptual models or frameworks that provide a more structured and comprehensive view of a topic. The elements and components of the HID models were categorized into five main components, including information issues, communication issues, psychology issues, social issues and theories. Most studies employed, existing theories, evidence, or principles to design their approaches. The main setting of studies were COVID‑19 and related topics such as vaccination.
Conclusions: By synthesizing the HID models we tried to find the gap among types, components, designing approaches and setting of models. It seems we need some HID models based on contextual frameworks to understand deeply the way of being born, spread and death of HIDs in society. Also, future advancements in HID models should focus on other diseases rather than COVID‑19 to provide a holistic approach in diverse healthcare landscapes.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Zheng J, Lee DKC. Understanding the Evolution of the Internet: Web1.0 to Web3.0, Web3 and Web 3 plus. Handbook of Digital Currency: Bitcoin, Innovation, Financial Instruments, and Big Data,second edition (2023), Available from: https://ssrn.com/ abstract=4431284 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4431284. [Last accesse on 2023 Apr 28].
Unzeelah M, Memon ZA, editors. Fighting against fake news by connecting machine learning approaches with Web3. 2022 International Conference on Emerging Trends in Smart Technologies (ICETST), IEEE, 2022.
Barua Z. COVID 19 misinformation on social media and public’s health behavior: Understanding the moderating role of situational motivation and credibility evaluations. Hu Arenas 2022. doi: 10.1007/s42087 022 00291 w.
Tai Z, Sun T. Media dependencies in a changing media environment: The case of the 2003 SARS epidemic in China. New Media Soc 2007;9:987 1009.
Eysenbach G. Infodemiology and infoveillance: Framework for an emerging set of public health informatics methods to analyze search, communication and publication behavior on the Internet. J Med Internet Res 2009;11:e11.
Hansson S, Orru K, Torpan S, Bäck A, Kazemekaityte A, Meyer SF, et al. COVID 19 information disorder: Six types of harmful information during the pandemic in Europe. J Risk Res 2021;24:380 93.
Wardle C, Derakhshan H. Info rmation Disorder: Toward an Interdisciplinary Framework for Research and Policymaking. Council of Europe Strasbourg; 2017.
Pandita R. Information pollution, a mounting threat: Internet a major causality. J Inf Sci Theory Pract 2014;2:49 60.
Samuel E. Fact Checking as a Solution to Political Disinformation in Nigeria. Available from: https://idac.dubawa. org/fact-checking-as-a-solution-to-political-disinformation-in-nigeria/. [Last accessed 2023 Feb 15].
Thomas Z. WHO says fake coronavirus claims causing ‘infodemic’. BBC News. 2020. Available from: https://www.bbc. com/news/technology-51497800 [Last accessed 2023 Feb 05].
Pulido CM, Villarejo Carballido B, Redondo Sama G, Gómez A. COVID 19 infodemic: More retweets for science based information on coronavirus than for false information. Int Sociol 2020;35:377 92.
Baines D, Elliott RJ. Defining misinformation, disinformation and malinformation: An urgent need for clarity during the COVID-19 infodemic, Discussion Papers 20-06, Department of Economics, University of Birmingham. 2020.
Rubin, Victoria L. Disinformation and misinformation triangle. J. Documentation 2019;75:1013-34.
Vraga EK, Bode L. Defining Misinformation and Understanding its Bounded Nature: Using Expertise and Evidence for Describing Misinformation. Political Communication 2020 37:136-144. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2020.1716500.
Bastani P, Hakimzadeh SM, Bahrami MA. Designing a conceptual framework for misinformation on social media: A qualitative study on COVID 19. BMC Res Notes 2021;14:1 6.
Apuke OD, Omar B. Modelling the antecedent factors that affect online fake news sharing on COVID 19: The moderating role of fake news knowledge. Health Edu Res 2020;35:490 503.
Kandel N. Information disorder syndrome and its management. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc 2020;58:280.
Loomba S, de Figueiredo A, Piatek SJ, de Graaf K, Larson HJ. Measuring the impact of COVID 19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA. Nat Hum Behav 2021;5:337 48.
Kumar N, Walter N, Nyhan K, Khoshnood K, Tucker JD, Bauch CT, et al. Interventions to mitigate COVID 19 misinformation: protocol for a scoping review. Sys Rev 2022;11. doi: 10.1186/s13643 022 01917 4.
Gwiaździński P, Gundersen AB, Piksa M, Krysińska I, Kunst JR, Noworyta K, et al. Psychological interventions countering misinformation in social media: A scoping review. Front Psychiatry 2023;13:974782.
Tangcharoensathien V, Calleja N, Nguyen T, Purnat T, D’Agostino M, Garcia Saiso S, et al. Framework for managing the COVID 19 infodemic: Methods and results of an online, crowdsourced WHO technical consultation. J Med Int Res 2020;22:e19659.
Kim HK, Ahn J, Atkinson L, Kahlor LA. Effects of COVID 19 misinformation on information seeking, avoidance, and processing: A multicountry comparative study. Sci Commun 2020;42:586 615.
Ransing R, Adiukwu F, Pereira Sanchez V, Ramalho R, Orsolini L, Teixeira ALS, et al. Mental health interventions during the COVID 19 pandemic: A conceptual framework by early career psychiatrists. Asian J Psychiatr 2020;51:102085.
Daradkeh M. Analyzing sentiments and diffusion characteristics of COVID 19 vaccine misinformation topics in social media: A data analytics framework. International Journal of Business Analyticsl (IJBAN) 2021;9:1-22. DOI: 10.4018/IJBAN.292056
Van der Meer TG, Jin Y. Seeking formula for misinformation treatment in public health crises: The effects of corrective information type and source. Health Commun 2020;35:560 75.
Ljungholm DP, Olah ML. Regulating fake news content during COVID 19 pandemic: Evidence based reality, trustworthy sources, and responsible media reporting. Rev Contempo Philos 2020;19:43 9.
Bautista JR, Zhang Y, Gwizdka J. Healthcare professionals’ acts of correcting health misinformation on social media. Int J Med Inform 2021;148:104375.
Van Bavel JJ, Harris EA, Pärnamets P, Rathje S, Doell KC, Tucker JA. Political psychology in the digital (mis) information age: A model of news belief and sharing. Soc Issues Policy Rev 2021;15:84 113.
Borah P, Su Y, Xiao X, Lee DKL. Incidental news exposure and COVID 19 misperceptions: A moderated mediation model. Comput Human Behav 2022;129:107173.
Liu H, Chen Q, Evans R. How official social media affected the infodemic among adults during the first wave of COVID 19 in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022;19:6751.
Yan Q, Shan S, Sun M, Zhao F, Yang Y, Li Y. A social media infodemic based prediction model for the number of severe and critical COVID 19 patients in the lockdown area. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022;19:8109.
Zhao Y, Zhu S, Wan Q, Li T, Zou C, Wang H, et al. Understanding How and by Whom COVID 19 misinformation is spread on social media: Coding and network analyses. J Med Internet Res 2022;24:e37623.
Apuke OD, Omar B. Fake news and COVID 19: Modelling the predictors of fake news sharing among social media users. Telemat Inform 2021;56:101475.
Jamil S, Appiah Adjei G. Battling with infodemic and disinfodemic: The quandary of journalists to report on COVID 19 pandemic in Pakistan. Media Asia 2020;47:88 109.
Bushuyev S, Babayev I, Bushuiev D, Bushuyeva N, Babayev J, editors. Emotional Behavior in the” Infodemic vs. Panicdemic vs. Pandemic” modeling COVID 19. ITPM; 2021. Available from: https://easychair.org/publications/preprint/4lSl.
Monkman H, Kushniruk AW, Parush A, Lesselroth BJ. Information chaos: An adapted framework describing citizens’ experiences with information during COVID 19. Context Sensitive Health Informatics: The Role of Informatics in Global Pandemics: IOS Press; 2021. p. 26 30.
Scannell D, Desens L, Guadagno M, Tra Y, Acker E, Sheridan K, et al. COVID 19 vaccine discourse on Twitter: A content analysis of persuasion techniques, sentiment and mis/disinformation. J Health Commun 2021;26:443 59.
Kapantai E, Christopoulou A, Berberidis C, Peristeras V. A systematic literature review on disinformation: Toward a unified taxonomical framework. New Media & Society 2021;23:1301-26.
Zeraatkar K, Ahmadi M. Trends of infodemiology studies: A scoping review. Health Inf Libr J 2018;35:91 120.
Khaleel I, Wimmer BC, Peterson GM, Zaidi STR, Roehrer E, Cummings E, et al. Health information overload among health consumers: A scoping review. Patient Educ Couns 2020;103:15 32.
Beasley JW, Wetterneck TB, Temte J, Lapin JA, Smith P, Rivera Rodriguez AJ, et al. Information chaos in primary care: Implications for physician performance and patient safety. J Am Board Fam Med 2011;24:745 51.
Borges do Nascimento IJ, Pizarro AB, Almeida JM, Azzopardi Muscat N, Gonçalves MA, Björklund M, et al. Infodemics and health misinformation: A systematic review of reviews. Bull World Health Organ 2022;100:544 61.
Frey E, Bonfiglioli C, Brunner M, Frawley J. Parents’ use of social media as a health information source for their children: A scoping review. Acad Pediatr 2022;22:526 39.
Gupta M, Dennehy D, Parra CM, Mäntymäki M, Dwivedi YK. Fake news believability: The effects of political beliefs and espoused cultural values. Inf Manag 2023;60:103745.
Teng X, Lin YR, Chung WT, Li A, Kovashka A, editors. Characterizing user susceptibility to COVID 19 misinformation on Twitter. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 2022.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.