Psychometric Evaluation of the Anxiety Assessment Scale for Pregnant Women in Labor in an Iranian Population

Robab Hasanzadeh, Mohammad Asghari Jafarabadi, Elahe Rezazadeh, Mojgan Mirghafourvand

Abstract


Background: Anxiety Assessment Scale for pregnant women in labor (AASPWL), which includes nine items in two subdomains, has been designed as the first specific tool for assessing the anxiety of pregnant mothers in labor. Anxiety is one of the most common psychological complications of mothers in labor and one of the factors affecting the experience of childbirth and maternal delivery satisfaction. Until now, a questionnaire concerning women’s anxiety in labor has not yet been used in Iran. This tool can better determine maternal anxiety compared to other general tools and help take necessary measures if needed; however, its validity and reliability have not been determined. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of AASPWL in Iranian women.

Materials and Methods: Through purposive sampling, 180 pregnant women hospitalized for labor between 2021 and 2022 were included in the study. AASPWL was evaluated regarding face and content validity using a quantitative method and construct validity (through confirmatory factor analyses). The questionnaire’s reliability was determined using the internal consistency method.

Results: In this study, the content validity index (CVI) and content validity ratio (CVR) of the AASPWL instrument were 0.96 and 0.97, respectively. The impact score of all items was above 1.5. The values of the fit indices confirmed the validity of the model. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.72 for factor 1, 0.66 for factor 2, and 0.65 for the whole instrument.

Conclusions: The Persian version of AASPWL is a reliable and trustworthy tool for evaluating labor anxiety regarding Iranian women.


Keywords


Anxiety, Iran, labor, psychometric

Full Text:

PDF

References


Hantsoo L, Epperson CN. Anxiety disorders among women: A female lifespan approach. Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ) 2017;15:162 72.

Davis EP, Narayan AJ. Pregnancy as a period of risk, adaptation, and resilience for mothers and infants. Dev Psychopathol 2020;32:1625 39.

Van de Loo KFE, Vlenterie R, Nikkels SJ, Merkus PJFM, Roukema J, Verhaak CM, et al. Depression and anxiety during pregnancy: The influence of maternal characteristics. Birth 2018;45:478 89.

Jackson L, De Pascalis L. Postpartum women’s psychological experiences during the COVID 19 pandemic: A modified recurrent cross sectional thematic analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021;21:625.

Crocq MA. A history of anxiety: From hippocrates to DSM. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 2015;17:319 25.

Kupfer DJ. Anxiety and DSM 5. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 2015;17:245 6.

Sharma B, Jungari S, Lawange A. Factors affecting fear of childbirth among urban women in India: A qualitative study. Sage Open 2022;12. doi: 10.1177/21582440221089485.

Floris L, Irion O. Association between anxiety and pain in the latent phase of labour upon admission to the maternity hospital: Aprospective, descriptive study. J Health Psychol 2015;20:445 55.

Hassanzadeh R, Abbas Alizadeh F, Meedya S, Mohammad Alizadeh Charandabi S, Mirghafourvand M. Fear of childbirth, anxiety and depression in three groups of primiparous pregnant women not attending, irregularly attending and regularly attending childbirth preparation classes. BMC Womens Health 2020;20:180. doi: 10.1186/s12905 020 01048 9.

McKelvin G, Thomson G, Downe S. The childbirth experience: A systematic review of predictors and outcomes. Women Birth 2021;34:407 16. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.09.021.

Whelan AR, Recabo O, Ayala NK, Clark MA, Lewkowitz AK. The association of perceived labor agentry and depression and/or anxiety. Am J Perinatol 2023;40:1047 53.

Jisha C, Sreeja G. Effect of empowered female labour companion on anxiety, birth outcome, and maternal satisfaction among primiparturients. Manipal J Nurs Health Sci 2021;7:47 53.

Schwartz L, Toohill J, Creedy DK, Baird K, Gamble J, Fenwick J. Factors associated with childbirth self efficacy in Australian childbearing women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015;15:29. doi: 10.1186/s12884 015 0465 8.

Slade P, Balling K, Sheen K, Houghton G. Establishing a valid construct of fear of childbirth: Findings from in depth interviews with women and midwives. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019;19. doi: 10.1186/s12884 019 2241 7.

Durat G, Çulhacik GD, Doğu Ö, Turan Z, Atasoy I, Toker E. The development of an anxiety assessment scale for pregnant women in labor. Saudi Med J 2018;39:609 14.

Sutcliffe KL, Levett K, Dahlen HG, Newnham E, MacKay LM. How do anxiety and relationship factors influence the application of childbirth education strategies during labor and birth: A bowen family systems perspective. Int J Womens Health 2023;15:455 65.

Polit DF, Beck CT. Essentials of Nursing Research: Appraising Evidence for Nursing Practice. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2013.

Silverio SA, Davies SM, Christiansen P, Aparicio García ME, Bramante A, Chen P, et al. A validation of the postpartum specific anxiety scale 12 item research short form for use during global crises with five translations. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021;21:112. doi: 10.1186/s12884 021 03597 9.

Kalfoss M. Translation and adaption of questionnaires: A nursing challenge. SAGE Open Nurs 2019;5:1 13. doi: 10.1177/2377960818816810.

Yusoff MSB. ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. Educ Med J 2019;11:49–54.

Baghestani A, Ahmadi F, Tanha A, Meshkat M. Bayesian critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio. Meas Eval Couns Dev 2017;52:69 73.

Xia Y, Yang Y. RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data: Their story depends on the estimation methods. Behav Res 2019;51:409 28.

Sinesi A, Maxwell M, O’Carroll R, Cheyne H. Anxiety scales used in pregnancy: Systematic review. B J Psych Open 2019;5:e5. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2018.75.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.