A Pilot Study on Improving Patient Satisfaction in Kazakhstan: A Service Design Approach
Abstract
Background: Service design method is a user‑centric approach to improve the service through the patient point of view. The general purpose of the study was to improve satisfaction and increase service delivery in the occupational health clinic.
Materials and Methods: This is descriptive, qualitative study that utilized a service design approach and was conducted at an Occupational Health Clinic in Kazakhstan from March to September 2022. Data collection methods included observation and semi‑structured interviews. The study involved the participation of 15 patients and 5 nurses.
Results: The collaborative efforts of the multiprofessional team resulted in significant enhancements to patient satisfaction and service delivery at the occupational health clinic. Initiatives such as addressing wait times for medical documentation led to notable improvements, as reflected in positive feedback from 15 patients. The overall quality of medical service received earned an impressive average rating of 5 out of 5, signaling the successful achievement of the research aim.
Conclusions: The implementation of targeted initiatives, guided by a service design approach, has unequivocally elevated patient satisfaction and streamlined service delivery within the occupational health clinic. The collaborative efforts of the multiprofessional team, exemplified by initiative measures and innovative solutions, have addressed key areas such as waiting time, appointment organization, and recreational offerings. These outcomes not only validate the efficacy of the undertaken changes but also underscore the clinic’s commitment to continuous improvement in fostering a patient‑centric and efficient healthcare environment.
Keywords
References
Liu X, Zhou H, Wei J, Li M, Luo G, Naidoo N, et al. An occupational health survey on health utility and occupational diseases in Chinese university staff to inform cost-utility analysis. Front Public Health 2023;10:1022344.
On work-related injuries and occupational diseases in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Office of National Statistics. Agency for Strategic Planning and Reforms of the Republic of Kazakhstan. 2022. Available from: https://stat.gov.kz/ru/industries/business-statistics/stat-inno-/publiccations/6411/. [Retrieved on 2023 May 10, Last accessed on 2025 Feb 7].
Lorusso L, Lee JH, Worden EA. Design thinking for healthcare: Transliterating the creative problem-solving method into architectural practice. HERD 2021;14:16-29.
Stickdorn M, Lawrence A, Hormess ME, Schneider J. This is Service Design Doing: Applying Service Design Thinking in the Real World: A Practitioners’ Handbook (First Edition). O’Reilly Media, Inc.; 2018.
Faerden A, Rosenqvist C, Håkansson M, Strøm-Gundersen E, Stav A, Svartsund J, et al. Environmental transformations enhancing dignity in an acute psychiatric ward: Outcome of a user-driven service design project. HERD 2023;16:55-72.
Zamberlan C, Jobim Benedetti F, Najar Smeha L, Bär KA, Rodrigues Junior LF, Stein Backes D. Reliability and impact of user-centered social technologies in health: A new development proposal. Acta Paul Enferm 2023;36:1–8.
Fry KR. Why hospitals need service design. In: Pfannstiel MA, Rasche C, editors. Service Design and Service Thinking in Healthcare and Hospital Management. Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 377-99.
Eines TF, Angelo E, Vatne S. Discourse analysis of health providers’ experiences using service design. Nurs Open 2019;6:84–92.
Tindall RM, Ferris M, Townsend M, Boschert G, Moylan S. A first‐hand experience of co‐design in mental health service design: Opportunities, challenges, and lessons. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2021;30:1693-702.
Rodrigues da Silva N, Costa R, Orlandi Honório Locks M, Fabiane Sebold L. Design thinking: An approach to research and innovation in nursing. Cogitare Enferm 2023;28:1–12.
Gallan AS, Perlow B, Shah R, Gravdal J. The impact of patient shadowing on service design: Insights from a family medicine clinic. Patient Exp J 2021;8:88-98.
Graham AK, Wildes JE, Reddy M, Munson SA, Barr Taylor C, Mohr DC. User-centered design for technology-enabled services for eating disorders. Int J Eat Disord 2019;52:1095–107.
Postma S, Schers H, van de Belt T, van Boven K, ten Napel H, Stappers H, et al. Assessment of functioning in Dutch primary care: Development study of a consultation tool for patients with chronic conditions and multimorbidity. Health Expect 2022;25:1363–73.
Udesen SEJ, Nielsen DS, Andersen N, Rasmussen CH, Mikkelsen S, Braband M, et al. Healthcare professionals’ experience with emergency department-based acute care performed within nursing homes. Age Ageing 2022;51:1–10.
Fildes K, Stefoska NA, Atkinson J, Lambert K, Lee A, Pugh D, et al. Optimising health care for people living with chronic kidney disease: Health-professional perspectives. J Ren Care 2022;48:168–76.
Brooks-Carthon JM, Brom H, Kim V, Hedgeland T, Ponietowicz E, Cacchione P. How innovation and design thinking can improve care: Empathy and collaboration create opportunities to help vulnerable populations. ISNA Bull 2021;48:12–3.
Dahlgren L, Hällgren Graneheim U, Sahlén KG, Emmelin M, Winkvist A. Qualitative Methodology for International Public Health. Umeå: Umeå Universitet; 2019.
Hamilton AB, Finley EP. Qualitative methods in implementation research: An introduction. Psychiatry Res 2019;280:112516.
Khalife J, Ekman B, Ammar W, El-Jardali F, Al Halabi A, Barakat E, et al. Exploring patient perspectives: A qualitative inquiry into healthcare perceptions, experiences and satisfaction in Lebanon. PloS One 2023;18:e0280665.
van den Boom NAC, Douwes I, Poeze M, Evers SMAA. Patient experiences and preferences during treatment and recovery of Lisfranc fractures: A qualitative interview study. Injury 2022;53:4152-8.
Service Design Toolkit. JAMK University of Applied Sciences. Available from: https://oecd-opsi.org/toolkits/jamk-service-design-toolkit/. [Retrieved on 2023 Jun 5, Last accessed on 2025 Feb 7].
Order of the Chairman of the Committee for Medical and Pharmaceutical Control of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Dated December 10, 2021. No. 520-ND. On approval of the algorithm for determining patient satisfaction with the quality of medical care through the use of departmental information systems. Available from: https://online.zakon.kz/ Document/?doc_id=38743376. [Retrieved on 2023 Oct 2, Last accessed on 2025 Feb 7].
Han N, Han SH, Chu H, Kim J, Rhew KY, Yoon J-H, et al. Service design oriented multidisciplinary collaborative team care service model development for resolving drug related problems. PLoS One 2018;13:e0201705.
Liang H, Xue Y, Zhang ZR. Patient satisfaction in China: A national survey of inpatients and outpatients. BMJ Open 2021;11:e049570.
Endalamaw A, Gilks CF, Ambaw F, Chatfield MD, Assefa Y. Satisfaction of tuberculosis patients to healthcare services at the global level: A systematic review. Health Soc Care Community 2022;30:e3435-46.
Lee S, Groß SE, Pfaff H, Dresen A. Waiting time, communication quality, and patient satisfaction: An analysis of moderating influences on the relationship between perceived waiting time and the satisfaction of breast cancer patients during their inpatient stay. Patient Educ Couns 2020;103:819-25.
Teka M, Dihar G, Dana T, Asnake G, Wakgari N, Bonger Z, et al. Satisfaction with regular hospital foodservices and associated factors among adult patients in Wolaita zone, Ethiopia: A facility-based cross-sectional study. PLoS One 2022;17:e0264163. Erratum in: PLoS One 2022;17:e0273275.
Stoumpos AI, Kitsios F, Talias MA. Digital transformation in healthcare: Technology acceptance and its applications. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2023;20:3407.
Chawłowska E, Karasiewicz M, Marcinkowska K, Giernaś B, Jóźwiak P, Lipiak A. Nurses’ perspectives on smoking policies, safety and cessation support in psychiatric wards: A Cross sectional survey. Healthcare (Basel) 2022;10:1735.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.