The Effectiveness of Prenatal Care Programs on Reducing Preterm Birth in Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Women: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis

Solmaz Mohammadi, Kobra Shojaei, Elham Maraghi, Zahra Motaghi

Abstract


Background: Preterm Birth (PTB) is one of the leading causes of infant morbidity and mortality. Prenatal care is an effective way to improve pregnancy outcomes but there is limited evidence of effective interventions to improve perinatal outcomes in disadvantaged pregnant women. This review was conducted with the aim to assess the effectiveness of prenatal care programs in reducing PTB in socioeconomically disadvantaged women.

Materials and Methods: We searched the Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from January 1, 1990 to August 31, 2021. The inclusion criteria included clinical trials and cohort studies focusing on prenatal care in deprived women with the primary outcome of PTB (< 37 weeks). Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias and the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Heterogeneity was evaluated using the Q test and I2 statistics. The pooled odds ratio was calculated using random‑effects models.

Results: In total, 14 articles covering 22,526 women were included in the meta‑analysis. Interventions/exposures included group prenatal care, home visits, psychosomatic programs, integrated intervention on socio‑behavioral risk factors, and behavioral intervention through education, social support, joint management, and multidisciplinary care. The pooled results showed that all types of interventions/exposure were associated with a reduction in the risk of PTB [OR = 0.86; 95% confidence interval: (0.64, 1.16); I2 = 79.42%].

Conclusions: Alternative models of prenatal care reduce PTB in socioeconomically disadvantaged women compared with standard care. The limited number of studies may affect the power of this study.



Keywords


Meta‑analysis, prenatal care, preterm birth, program evaluation, socioeconomic factors

Full Text:

PDF

References


American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. ACOG practice bulletin no. 127: Management of preterm labor. 2012;119:1308 17.

Sandall J, Tribe RM, Avery L, Mola G, Visser GH, Homer CS, et al. Short term and long term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children. Lancet 2018;392:1349 57.

Vogel JP, Chawanpaiboon S, Moller A B, Watananirun K, Bonet M, Lumbiganon P. The global epidemiology of preterm birth. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2018;52:3 12.

Galindo Sevilla N, Reyes Arroyo F, Mancilla Ramírez J. The role of complement in preterm birth and prematurity. J Perinat Med 2019;47:793 803.

Locatelli A, Consonni S, Ghidini AJO, Clinics G. Preterm labor: Approach to decreasing complications of prematurity. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2015;42:255 74.

Sarda S, Abogunrin S, Zhang Y, Sarri G, editors. Economic Burden of Very Preterm Birth: A Systematic Literature Review. Value in Health360 Park Ave South, New York, NY 10010 1710 USA: Elsevier Science Inc; 2017.

Bérard A, Le Tiec M, De Vera MA. Study of the costs and morbidities of late preterm birth. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2012;97:F329 34.

Manuck TA, Rice MM, Bailit JL, Grobman WA, Reddy UM, Wapner RJ, et al. Preterm neonatal morbidity and mortality by gestational age: A contemporary cohort. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016;215:103.e1 14.

Vigod SN, Villegas L, Dennis CL, Ross LE. Prevalence and risk factors for postpartum depression among women with preterm and low-birth-weight infants: A systematic review. BJOG 2010;117:540 50.

Tellapragada C, Eshwara VK, Bhat P, Acharya S, Kamath A, Bhat S, et al. Risk factors for preterm birth and low birth weight among pregnant Indian women: A hospital based prospective study. J Prev Med Public Health 2016;49:165 75.

Rayment Jones H, Murrells T, Sandall J. An investigation of the relationship between the caseload model of midwifery for socially disadvantaged women and childbirth outcomes using routine data–a retrospective, observational study. Midwifery 2015;31:409 17.

Weightman AL, Morgan HE, Shepherd MA, Kitcher H, Roberts C, Dunstan FD. Social inequality and infant health in the UK: Systematic review and meta analyses. BMJ Open 2012;2:e000964. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen 2012 000964.

Arunda M, Emmelin A, Asamoah BO. Effectiveness of antenatal care services in reducing neonatal mortality in Kenya: Analysis of national survey data. Glob Health Action 2017;10:1328796.

Hollowell J, Oakley L, Kurinczuk JJ, Brocklehurst P, Gray R. The effectiveness of antenatal care programmes to reduce infant mortality and preterm birth in socially disadvantaged and vulnerable women in high income countries: A systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2011;11:1 20. doi: 10.1186/1471 2393 11 13.15. Puthussery S. Perinatal outcomes among migrant mothers in the United Kingdom: Is it a matter of biology, behaviour, policy, social determinants or access to health care? Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2016;32:39 49.

Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Chandler J, Welch VA, Higgins JP, et al. Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: A new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019;10:14651858. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000142.

Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JAC. (2011). Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1. 0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook. cochrane. org, 243-96.

Lo CK L, Mertz D, Loeb M. Newcastle Ottawa scale: Comparing reviewers’ to authors’ assessments. BMC Med Res Methodol 2014;14:1 5. doi: 10.1186/1471 2288 14 45.

Dias S, Sutton AJ, Welton NJ, Ades A. Evidence synthesis for decision making 3: Heterogeneity—subgroups, meta regression, bias, and bias adjustment. Med Decis Making 2013;33:618 40.

Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2011;343:d5928. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928.

Gareau S, Lòpez De Fede A, Loudermilk BL, Cummings TH, Hardin JW, Picklesimer AH, et al. Group prenatal care results in Medicaid savings with better outcomes: A propensity score analysis of CenteringPregnancy participation in South Carolina. Matern Child Health J 2016;20:1384 93.

Jacobs S. Outcomes of CenteringPregnancy® in African American Women. Carlow University; 2016.

Gao Y, Gold L, Josif C, Bar Zeev S, Steenkamp M, Barclay L, et al. A cost consequences analysis of a midwifery group practice for Aboriginal mothers and infants in the top end of the northern territory, Australia. Midwifery 2014;30:447 55.

Doyle O, McGlanaghy E, Palamaro Munsell E, McAuliffe FM. Home based educational intervention to improve perinatal outcomes for a disadvantaged community: A randomised control trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2014;180:162 7.

Collado MAO, Saez M, Favrod J, Hatem M. Antenatal psychosomatic programming to reduce postpartum depression risk and improve childbirth outcomes: A randomized controlled trial in Spain and France. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014;14:1 12. doi: 10.1186/1471 2393 14 22.

Picklesimer AH, Billings D, Hale N, Blackhurst D, Covington Kolb S. The effect of CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care on preterm birth in a low income population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206:415.e1 7.

Subramanian S, Katz KS, Rodan M, Gantz MG, El Khorazaty NM, Johnson A, et al. An integrated randomized intervention to reduce behavioral and psychosocial risks: Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. Matern Child Health J 2012;16:545 54.

Kemp L, Harris E, McMahon C, Matthey S, Vimpani G, Anderson T, et al. Child and family outcomes of a long term nurse home visitation programme: A randomised controlled trial. Arch Dis Child 2011;96:533 40.

Ickovics JR, Kershaw TS, Westdahl C, Magriples U, Massey Z, Reynolds H, et al. Group prenatal care and perinatal outcomes: A randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:330 9.

Ickovics JR, Kershaw TS, Westdahl C, Rising SS, Klima C, Reynolds H, et al. Group prenatal care and preterm birth weight: Results from a matched cohort study at public clinics. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2003;102:1051 7.

Jackson DJ, Lang JM, Swartz WH, Ganiats TG, Fullerton J, Ecker J, et al. Outcomes, safety, and resource utilization in a collaborative care birth center program compared with traditional physician based perinatal care. Am J Public Health 2003;93:999 1006.

Reece E, Lequizamon G, Silva J, Whiteman V, Smith D. Intensive interventional maternity care reduces infant morbidity and hospital costs. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2002;11:204 10.

Moore ML, Meis PJ, Ernest JM, Wells HB, Zaccaro DJ, Terrell T. A randomized trial of nurse intervention to reduce preterm and low birth weight births. Obstet Gynecol 1998;91:656 61.

Kitzman H, Olds DL, Henderson CR, Hanks C, Cole R, Tatelbaum R, et al. Effect of prenatal and infancy home visitation by nurses on pregnancy outcomes, childhood injuries, and repeated childbearing: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1997;278:644 52.

Depp R, IAMS J, Goldenberg R, Davis R, Copper R, Corliss D, et al. Multicenter randomized, controlled trial of a preterm birth prevention program. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;169:352 6.

Rothberg AD, Lits B. Psychosocial support for maternal stress during pregnancy: Effect on birth weight. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991;165:403 7.

Barros A, Ronsmans C, Axelson H, Loaiza E, Bertoldi A, França G, et al. Equity in maternal, newborn, and child health interventions in countdown to 2015: A retrospective review of survey data from 54 countries. Lancet 2013;33:91 2.

Carter EB, Temming LA, Akin J, Fowler S, Macones GA, Colditz GA, et al. Group prenatal care compared with traditional prenatal care: A systematic review and meta analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2016;128:551 61.

Muglia LJ, Katz M. The enigma of spontaneous preterm birth. N Engl J Med 2010;362:529 35.

Heberlein EC, Picklesimer AH, Billings DL, Covington Kolb S, Farber N, Frongillo EA. The comparative effects of group prenatal care on psychosocial outcomes. Arch Womens Ment Health 2016;19:259 69.

Byerley BM, Haas DM. A systematic overview of the literature regarding group prenatal care for high risk pregnant women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017;17:1 9. doi: 10.1186/ s12884 017 1522 2.

Liu N, Li P, Wang J, Chen D, Sun W, Zhang W. Effects of home visits for pregnant and postpartum women on premature birth, low birth weight and rapid repeat birth: A meta analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Fam Pract 2019;36:533 43.

Issel LM, Forrestal SG, Slaughter J, Wiencrot A, Handler A. A review of prenatal home-visiting effectiveness for improving birth outcomes. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2011;40:157 65.

Mbuagbaw L, Medley N, Darzi AJ, Richardson M, Garga KH, Ongolo-Zogo P. Health system and community level interventions for improving antenatal care coverage and health outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015:CD010994. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010994.pub2.

Goyal NK, Hall ES, Meinzen Derr JK, Kahn RS, Short JA, Van Ginkel JB, et al. Dosage effect of prenatal home visiting on pregnancy outcomes in at risk, first time mothers. Pediatrics 2013;132(Suppl 2):S118 25.

Kamei T. Information and communication technology for home care in the future. Jpn J Nurs Sci 2013;10:154 61.

Hodnett ED, Fredericks S. Support during pregnancy for women at increased risk of low birthweight babies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003CD000198. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000198.

Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, Shennan A, Devane D. Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;4CD004667. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub5.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.