Psychometric Properties of the Disrespect and Abuse Questionnaire in Iranian Parturient Women

Khadije Hajizadeh, Mohammad Asghari Jafarabadi, Maryam Vaezi, Shahla Meedya, Sakineh Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi, Mojgan Mirghafourvand

Abstract


Background: Disrespect and abuse during childbirth is regarded as harassment of women and a violation of their rights. The aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the disrespect and abuse questionnaire in Iranian parturient women.

Materials and Methods: This cross‑sectional study was conducted on 265 postpartum women in both private and public hospitals in Tabriz, Iran. The scale was translated from English into Farsi. In the quantitative face validity, the impact score was determined for each item. Moreover, in the quantitative content validity, the Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Content Validity Index (CVI) were assessed based on the comments of experts on the relevance, clarity, and simplicity of items (CVI) and the necessity of items (CVR). Construct validity was assessed through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses.

Results: In the face validity assessment, all items received a minimum impact score of 1.5. In assessing the content validity, all the items attained the minimum acceptable value of CVR (>0.69) and CVI (>0.79). According to the exploratory factor analysis, the Disrespect and Abuse Questionnaire has 23 items and five factors, including abandoning the mother, improper care, mother’s immobility, not talking to the mother, and mother’s deprivation. The construct validity of the scale was confirmed by the confirmatory factor analysis, in which X2/df <5 and root mean square error of approximation <0.08.

Conclusions: The Farsi version of the disrespect and abuse questionnaire can be used as a valid tool for assessing instances of lack of respectful maternity care in the postpartum period.



Keywords


Abuse, Iran, Psychometrics, reliability, validity

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bowser D, Hill K. Exploring Evidence for Disrespect and Abuse in Facility Based Childbirth: Report of a Landscape Analysis. Bethesda: Maryland: USAID Traction. Project, Harvard School of Public Health and University Research Corporation, LLC; 2010.

Sheferaw ED, Mengesha TZ, Wase SB. Development of a tool to measure women’s perception of respectful maternity care in public health facilities. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016;16:67.

Dhakal P, Creedy D, Gamble G, Newnham E, Mcinees R. Effects of an online education intervention on nursing students’ perceptions towards respectful maternity care. Women Birth 2022;35:52 3.

Kruk M PM, Mbaruku G, de Pinho H, Galea S. Women’s preferences for place of delivery in rural Tanzania: A population based discrete choice experiment. Am J Public Health 2009;99:1666 72.

Madeira S, Pileggi V, Souza JP. Abuse and disrespect in childbirth process and abortion situation in Latin America and the Caribbean—systematic review protocol. Syst Rev 2017;6:152.

Warren C, Njuki R, Abuya T, Ndwiga C, Maingi G, Serwanga J, et al. Study protocol for promoting respectful maternity care initiative to assess, measure and design interventions to reduce disrespect and abuse during childbirth in Kenya. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013;13:21.

Ross Davie M. Measuring the Quantity and Quality of Midwifery Support of Women during Labour and Childbirth: The Development and Testing of the ‘Supportive Midwifery in Labour instrument‘. Vol 13. Stirling, Scotland, UK: University of Stirling; 2012. p. 163.

Jafari E, Mohebbi P, Mazloomzadeh S. Factors related to women’s childbirth satisfaction in physiologic and routine childbirth groups. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res 2017;22:219 24.

Azami Aghdash S, Ghojazadeh M, Dehdilani N, Mohammadi M. Prevalence and causes of cesarean section in Iran: Systematic review and meta analysis. Iran J Public Health J 2014;43:545.

Sawyer A, Ayers S, Abbot J, Gyte G, Rabe H, Duley L. Measures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth: A comparative review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013;13:108. doi: 10.1186/1471 2393 13 108.

Hajizadeh KH, Vaezi M, Meedya SH, Charandabi SMA, Mirghafourvand M. Respectful maternity care and its related factors in maternal units of public and private hospitals in Tabriz: A sequential explanatory mixed method study protocol. Reprod Health 2020;17:1 7.

Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric Theory. 3rd ed. New York: Mc Graw Hill; 1994.

Asefa A, Bekele D. Status of respectful and non abusive care during facility based childbirth in a hospital and health centers in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Reprod Health 2015;12:33.

USAID: respectful maternity care standards. USAID. 2011. Availlable from: https://www.k4health.org/sites/default/ files/RMC%20Survey%20Report.pdf. [Last accessed on 2021 Sep 22].

Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Pers Psychol 1975;28:563 75.

Hajizadeh E, Asghari M. Statistical Methods and Analysis in Health and Biosciences a Research Methodological Approach Using SPSS Practical Guide. Tehran: Jahad Daneshgahi; 2011.

Tinsley HEA, Weiss DJ. Handbook of Applied Multivariate Statistics and Mathematical Modeling. In: Tinsley HEA, Brown SD, editors. 1. San Diego: Academic Press; 2000. p. 95 118.

Seyf AA. Measurement, Test and Educational Evaluation. Vol 7. Douran: Tehran. 2016.

Forster DA, McLachlan HL, Davey MA, Biro MA, Farrell T, Gold L, et al. Continuity of care by a primary midwife (caseload midwifery) increases women’s satisfaction with antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum care: Results from the COSMOS randomised controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016; 16:28.

Meedya S, Fahy K, Parrattb JA. The milky way educational and support programme: Structure, content and strategies. Women Birth 2016;29:388 93.

Sharts Hopko NC. Oral intake during labor: A review of the evidence. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 2010;35:197 203.

Singata M, Tranmer J, Gyte GM. Restricting oral fluid and food intake during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;20:1 59.

Iravani M, Zarean E, Janghorbani M, Bahrami M. Women’s needs and expectations during normal labor and delivery. J Edu Health Promot 2015;4:6.

Abuya T, Ndwiga C, Ritter J, Kanya L, Bellows B, Binkin N, et al. The effect of a multi component intervention on disrespect and abuse during childbirth in Kenya. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015;15:224.

Sando D, Ratcliffe H, McDonald K, Spiegelman D, Lyatuu G, Mwanyika Sando M, et al. The prevalence of disrespect and abuse during facility based childbirth in urban Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016;16:236. doi: 10.1186/ s12884 016 1019 4.

Vogel JP, Bohren MA, Tunçalp O, Oladapo OT, Adanu RM, Balde ME. How women are treated during facility based childbirth: Development and validation of measurement tools in four countries – phase 1 formative research study protocol. Reprod Health 2015;12:60.

Okafor II, Ugwu EO, Obi SN. Disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth in a low-income country. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2015;128:110 3.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.