Implementing the Verbal and Electronic Handover in General and Psychiatric Nursing Using the Introduction, Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation Framework: A Systematic Review

Carlo Lazzari

Abstract


Background: Patient handover (handoff in America) is the transfer of information and accountability among nurses assigned to patient care. Introduction, Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation (ISBAR) is currently the most popular framework for framing handovers. However, research shows that incomplete handovers and information transfers among healthcare providers and nurses exist and are responsible for adverse patient events.

Materials and Methods: The current systematic review aims to view contemporary literature on handover, especially but not exclusively in psychiatric settings, and to extract current conditions from Electronic Patient Records (EPRs) using the ISBAR framework. A total of fifty‑five scientific papers were selected to support the scoping review. Eligibility criteria included structured research to analyze outcomes, completed by reviewing policy papers and professional organization guidelines on I/SBAR handovers.

Results: Our systematic review shows that the application of ISBAR increases interprofessional communication skills and confidence and the quality of the transfer of clinical information about patients, resulting in increased patient safety and quality of care.

Conclusions: Implementing the knowledge and application of structured patient handover will respond to current recommendations for service improvement and quality of care. Furthermore, nurses who use ISBAR also reported its benefits as they feel they can deliver what is required for patient care information in a structured, fast, and efficient way. A further increase in the efficacy of handovers is reported by using EPR.


Keywords


Medicine, nursing, patient handoff, patient handover, psychiatric nursing

Full Text:

PDF

References


Smeulers M, Lucas C, Vermeulen H. What is the best nursing handover style to ensure continuity of information for hospital patients? Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014:CD009979. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009979.pub2.

Burgess A, van Diggele C, Roberts C, Mellis C. Teaching clinical handover with ISBAR. BMC Med Educ 2020;20:459.

Kim EJ, Seomun G. Handover in nursing: A concept analysis. Res Theory Nurs Pract 2020;34:297 20.

Australian Medical Association. Safe Handover: Safe Patients. AMA Clinical Handover Guide. Sydney: AMA; 2006. Available from: http://ama.com.au/node.

Government of Western Australia Department of Health. Clinical handover. WA Health, Government of Western Australia. Available from: https://ww2.health.wa.gov.au/Articles/A_E/ Clinical-handover. [Last accessed on 2022 Dec 23].

Rickard F, Lu F, Gustafsson L, MacArthur C, Cummins C, Coker I, et al. Clinical handover communication at maternity shift changes and women’s safety in Banjul, the Gambia: A mixed-methods study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022;22:784.

Eggins S, Slade D. Communication in clinical handover: Improving the safety and quality of the patient experience. J Public Health Res 2015;4:666. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2015.666.

The Joint Commission. Patient safety. Available from: https:// www.jointcommission.org/resources/patient-safety/. [Last accessed on 2022 Dec 12].

Matic J, Davidson PM, Salamonson Y. Review: Bringing patient safety to the forefront through structured computerization during clinical handover. J Clin Nurs 2011;20:184-9.

NHS Digital 75. Records and document management policy HS Digital. Available from: https://digital.nhs.uk/ about-nhs-digital/corporate-information-and-documents/records-and-document-management-policy. [Last accessed 2022 Dec 22].

Lazzari C. Chapter 11: Theoretical framworks of clinical handover in healthcare settings. In: Ito S (Ed.) Research Highlihts in Diseases and Health Research, BP Publisher, 2023:4. doi: 10.9734/bpi/rhdhr/v4.

Shamsaei A, Kazemi A, Enteshary-Najafabadi H, Borujeni NK. Essential criteria for designing healthy maternity wear: A narrative review. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res 2022;27:492-5.

Day G, Robert G, Rafferty AM. Gratitude in health care: A meta-narrative review. Qual Health Res 2020;30:2303-15.

Greenhalgh T, Thorne S, Malterud K. Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? Eur J Clin Invest 2018;48:e12931. doi: 10.1111/eci.12931.

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.

Bettany-Saltikov J, McSherry R. How to Do A Systematic Literature Review in Nursing: A Step-By-Step Guide. 2nd edn. London: Open University Press; 2016.

Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials. BMJ 2011;343:d5928. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928.

Gerchow L, Burka LR, Miner S, Squires A. Language barriers between nurses and patients: A scoping review. Patient Educ Couns 2021;104:534-53.

Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implement Sci 2010;5:69.

Kostoff M, Burkhardt C, Winter A, Shrader S. An interprofessional simulation using the SBAR communication tool. Am J Pharm Educ 2016;80:157. doi: 10.5688/ajpe809157.

Choi YR, Chang SO. Exploring interprofessional communication during nursing home emergencies using the SBAR framework. J Interprof Care 2023;37:83-90.

Hum RS. Cognitive disconnect and information overload: Electronic health record use for rounding and handover communications in a pediatric intensive care unit. Cognitive Informatics: 2019. p. 297-306.

Lee KR, Kim EJ. Relationship between interprofessional communication and team task performance. Clin Simul Nurs 2020;43:44-50.

Shrader S, Dunn B, Blake E, Phillips C. Incorporating standardized colleague simulations in a clinical assessment course and evaluating the impact on interprofessional communication. Am J Pharm Educ 2015;79:57.

Barnett S, Nagy MW, Hakim RC. Integration and assessment of the situation-background-assessment-recommendation framework into a pharmacotherapy skills laboratory for interprofessional communication and documentation. Curr Pharm Teach Learn 2017;9:794-801.

Acharya R, Thomas G, Hellaby M. Evaluation of a clinical handover simulation training session for junior doctors in psychiatry. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn 2016;3:23-7.

Brust-Sisti LA, Sturgill M, Volino LR. Situation, background, assessment, recommendation (SBAR) technique education enhances pharmacy student communication ability and confidence. Curr Pharm Teach Learn 2019;11:409-16.

Jeong JH, Kim EJ. Development and evaluation of an SBAR-based fall simulation program for nursing students. Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci) 2020;14:114-21.

Noh GO, Park MJ. Effectiveness of incorporating situation-background-assessment-recommendation (SBAR) methods into simulation-based education for nursing students: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Educ Today 2022;109:105252. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105252.

Cooper D, Keiser M, Berg K, Sherman E. Improving interprofessional communication confidence among physical therapy and nurse practitioner students. J Phys Ther Educ 2019;33:177-84.

Franko TS 2nd, Shah V, Hong KL, Bommareddy A. Evaluation of long term retention and utilization of the situation, background, assessment, recommendation (SBAR) communication technique. Curr Pharm Teach Learn 2021;13:122-26.

Chen M, Yin J, Jia R, Zhang H, Yan R, Zhang Y. Impact of ISBAR communication training on interpersonal communication and teamwork of residents in general practice standardized training. Technium Soc Sci J 2020;11:76-83.

Yeh V, Sherwood G, Durham C, Kardong-Edgren S, Schwartz T, Beeber L. Online simulation-based mastery learning with

deliberate practice: Developing interprofessional communication skill. Clin Simul Nurs 2019;32:27-38.

Breen D, O’Brien S, McCarthy N, Gallagher A, Walshe N. Effect of a proficiency-based progression simulation programme on clinical communication for the deteriorating patient: A randomized controlled trial. BMJ Open 2019;9:e025992.

Marshall S, Harrison J, Flanagan B. The teaching of a structured tool improves the clarity and content of interprofessional clinical communication. Qual Saf Health Care 2009;18:137-40.

Mutter MK, Pedersen K, Cunningham T, Martindale JR. Feedback methods in an interprofessional mock paging program. Med Sci Educ 2021;31:2001-5.

Janaway B, Zinchenko R, Anwar L, Wadlow C, Soda E, Cove K. Using SBAR in psychiatry: Findings from two London hospitals. BJPsych Open 2021;7(Suppl 1):S197.

Abela-Dimech F, Vuksic O. Improving the practice of handover for psychiatric inpatient nursing staff. Arch Psychiatr Nurs 2018;32:729-36.

Lee H, Jang SJ. Effects of flipped-learning-based simulation for nursing students: A retrospective survey. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2021;30:1263-73.

Ting WH, Peng FS, Lin HH, Hsiao SM. The impact of situation-background-assessment-recommendation (SBAR) on safety attitudes in the obstetrics department. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2017;56:171-74.

Raurell-Torredà M, Rascón-Hernán C, Malagón-Aguilera C, Bonmatí-Tomás A, Bosch-Farré C, Gelabert-Vilella S, et al. Effectiveness of a training intervention to improve communication between/awareness of team roles: A randomized clinical trial. J Prof Nurs 2021;37:479-87.

Spooner AJ, Aitken LM, Corley A, Chaboyer W. Developing a minimum dataset for nursing team leader handover in the intensive care unit: A focus group study. Aust Crit Care 2018;31:47-52.

Kaltoft A, Jacobsen YI, Tangsgaard M, Jensen HI. ISBAR as a structured tool for patient handover during postoperative recovery. J Perianesth Nurs 2022;37:34-9.

De Meester K, Verspuy M, Monsieurs KG, Van Bogaert P. SBAR improves nurse-physician communication and reduces unexpected death: A pre and post intervention study. Resuscitation 2013;84:1192-6.

Australian Commission on Safety and Quality of Care. Clinical handover. Clinical handover | Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Available from: https://www. safetyandquality.gov.au/our-work/communicating-safety/clinical-handover. [Last accessed on 2023 Jan 26].

Kohl F, Angerer P, Guthardt L, Weber J. Requirements for an electronic handover system for interprofessional collaboration between psychotherapists and occupational health professionals-a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2022;22:1087.

Australian Commission in Safety and Quality in Health Care. Isbar revisited: Identifying and solving barriers to effective clinical handover-project toolkit. ISBAR Revisited: Identifying and Solving Barriers to Effective Clinical Handover-Project toolkit | Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Available from: https://www.safetyandquality.gov. au/publications-and-resources/resource-library/isbar-revisited-identifying-and-solving-barriers-effective-clinical-handover-project-toolkit. [Last accessed on 2023 Jan 26].

Owen G, Wessely S, Murray R, editors. The Maudsley Handbook of Practical Psychiatry. Oxford, OUP Oxford; 2014.

Koli T, Filippidou M. Audit on the quality of handovers of a psychiatric liaison team in the UK: A short report. Psychiatr Danub 2017;29(Suppl 3):536-40.

Coolen E, Engbers R, Draaisma J, Heinen M, Fluit C. The use of SBAR as a structured communication tool in the pediatric non-acute care setting: Bridge or barrier for interprofessional collaboration? J Interprof Care 2020;15:1-10.

Ruhomauly Z, Betts K, Jayne-Coupe K, Karanfilian L, Szekely M, Relwani A, et al. Improving the quality of handover: Implementing SBAR. Future Healthc J 2019;6(Suppl 2):54.

Skelton L, Rogers J, Kalafatis C. Development and implementation of electronic medical handovers across psychiatric hospitals: Quality improvement initiative. BMJ Open Qual 2019;8:e000630. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000630.

Potent K, Levy B, Porritt A. Review of electronic discharge summaries from the general medicine, general surgery and mental health streams at a tertiary hospital: Retrospective analysis of timeliness, brevity and completeness. Aust Health Rev 2020;44:699-705.

Pun J. Factors associated with nurses’ perceptions, their communication skills and the quality of clinical handover in the Hong Kong context. BMC Nurs 2021;20:95.

Chiew L, Bakar SB, Ramakrishnan S, Cheng PL, Karunagaran Y, Bunyaman ZB. Nurse’s perception and compliance on identification, situation, background, assessment and recommendation (isbar) tools for handoff communication in tertiary hospital, Dammam. Malays J Med Res 2019;3:26-32.

Gardiner TM, Marshall AP, Gillespie BM. Clinical handover of the critically ill postoperative patient: An integrative review. Aust Crit Care 2015;28:226-34.

Marshall AP, Tobiano G, Murphy N, Comadira G, Willis N, Gardiner T, et al. Handover from operating theatre to the intensive care unit: A quality improvement study. Aust Crit Care 2019;32:229-36.

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Quality statement 4: Structured patient Handovers: Emergency and Acute Medical Care in over 16s: Quality standards. NICE. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/qs174/chapter/Quality-statement-4-Structured-patient-handovers. [Last accessed on 2023 Jan 26].

Nadzam DM. Nurses’ role in communication and patient safety. J Nurs Care Qual 2009;24:184-8.

Rabøl LI, Andersen ML, Østergaard D, Bjørn B, Lilja B, Mogensen T. Descriptions of verbal communication errors between staff. An analysis of 84 root cause analysis-reports from Danish hospitals. BMJ Qual Saf 2011;20:268-74.

NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement. SBAR-Implementation-and-Training-Guide. NHS choices. NHS; 2010. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/improvement-hub/ publication/safer-care-sbar-situation-background-assessment-recommendation-implementation-and-training-guide/. [Last accessed on 2023 Jan 26].

Wu S, Lin CS, Lin TC. Exploring knowledge sharing in virtual teams: A social exchange theory perspective. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’06), IEEE, 2006;1:26b. Available form: https:// api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:3156668. [Last accessed on 2023 Jan 26].

NHS Digital. Its name is Rio. Digital Health. 2017. Available from: https://www.digitalhealth.net/2008/12/its-name-is-rio/. [Last accessed on 2023 Jan 26].

Barnes SL, Campbell DA, Stockman KA, Wunderlink D. From theory to practice of electronic handover. Aust Health Rev 2011;35:384-91.

Sabet Sarvestani R, Moattari M, NikbakhtNasrabadi A,Momennasab M, Yektatalab S. Nursing handover: Are its principles taught in universities during bachelor’s degree? Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res 2014;19:679.

Dingley C, Daugherty K, Derieg MK, Persing R. Improving patient safety through provider communication strategy enhancements. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Keyes MA, Grady ML, editors. Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches (Vol. 3: Performance and Tools). Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008.

de Vries-Erich J, Reuchlin K, de Maaijer P, van de Ridder JM. Identifying facilitators and barriers for implementation of interprofessional education: Perspectives from medical educators in the Netherlands. J Interprof Care 2017;31:170-4.

Foronda C, MacWilliams B, McArthur E. Interprofessional communication in healthcare: An integrative review. Nurse Educ Pract 2016;19:36-40.

Müller M, Jürgens J, Redaèlli M, Klingberg K, Hautz WE, Stock S. Impact of the communication and patient handoff tool SBAR on patient safety: A systematic review. BMJ Open 2018;8:e022202. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022202.

Umberfield E, Ghaferi AA, Krein SL, Manojlovich M. Using incident reports to assess communication failures and patient outcomes. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2019;45:406-13.

Bhabra G, Mackeith S, Monteiro P, Pathier D. An experimental comparison of handover methods. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2007;89:298-300.

NHS. Electronic Patient Handover. Available from: https://hgs. uhb.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/Electronic-Patient-Handover-Policy-v2.0.pdf. [Last accessed on 2023 Jan 25].

Safran C, Goldberg H. Electronic patient records and the impact of the Internet. Int J Med Inform 2000;60:77-83.

Johnson M, Jefferies D, Nicholls D. Developing a minimum data set for electronic nursing handover. J Clin Nurs 2012;21:331-43.

Peters DH, Adam T, Alonge O, Agyepong IA, Tran N. Republished research: Implementation research: What it is and how to do it. Br J Sports Med 2014;48:731-6.

Eccles MP, Armstrong D, Baker R, Cleary K, Davies H, Davies S, et al. An implementation research agenda. Implementation Sci 2009;4:18. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-18.

Collis J, Hussey R. Business Research. 4th ed. New York: Palgrave; 2014.

Avellar SA, Thomas J, Kleinman R, Sama-Miller E, Woodruff SE, Coughlin R, et al. External validity: The next step for systematic reviews? Eval Rev 2017;41:283-325.

Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, et al. ROBINS-I: A tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions. BMJ 2016;355:i4919. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4919.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.