The Process of Professional Ethics Development in Midwifery Students: A Grounded Theory Study
Abstract
Background: Midwives are faced with important ethical issues in their professional lives; therefore, becoming a midwife is not only the acquisition of knowledge and skills but also includes acquiring moral values that cause fundamental changes in their attitudes toward their professional responsibilities. The aim of this study was to explore the process of professional ethics development in midwifery students.
Materials and Methods: This grounded theory study was conducted from 2020 to 2022 at Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. The participants included 17 midwifery students and 14 key informants. They were selected through purposeful and theoretical sampling. Data were collected using semi‑structured in‑depth interviews, field notes, and theoretical notes until theoretical saturation was achieved. Data collection and data analysis were performed simultaneously. Data were analyzed based on the grounded theory presented by Corbin and Strauss (2014) using MAXQDA Analytics Pro 2020.
Results: The core category was “interactive‑cognitive learning in a two‑way reasoning path” which addressed the participants’ main issue of moral numbness. Moral distress, interactive‑cognitive learning, moral reasoning, and moral hopelessness were the midwifery students’ strategies that led to a spectrum of moral internalization to moral burnout. The improper context of moral development was the context theme of this study.
Conclusions: The theory of “interactive‑cognitive learning in the two‑way path of reasoning” creates a deep understanding of the process of formation of professional ethics in midwifery students and it can be used in the effective training of students with the aim of promoting professional ethics in midwifery.
Keywords
References
Cakir M. Professional ethics in midwifery practice. Turkish J Bus Ethics 2016;9:311 5.
Simbar M, Kiani Z, Nazarpour S, Babaei F. Development and validation of the code of ethics for midwives in Iran. BMC Med Ethics 2023;24:76.
Buchanan K, Geraghty S, Whitehead L, Newnham E. Woman centred ethics: A feminist participatory action research. Midwifery 2023;117:103577. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2022.103577.
Crepinsek M, Bell R, Graham I, Coutts R. A global review of the inferred meaning of woman centred care within midwifery professional standards. Women Birth 2023;36:e99 105.
Fullerton JT, Thompson JB, Johnson P. Competency based education: The essential basis of pre service education for the professional midwifery workforce. Midwifery 2013;29:1129 36.
Fontein Kuipers Y, den Hartog van Veen H, Klop L, Zondag L. Conflicting values experienced by Dutch midwives: Dilemmas of loyalty, responsibility and selfhood. Clin Res Obstet Gynecol 2018;1:1 12.
Li J, Zhou Z, Zhang X. Enhancing medical ethics education for medical students in clinical research: Considerations and strategy analysis. Acta Bioethica 2023;29:9 16.
Pimentel D, Barbosa de Oliveira C, Vieira MJ. Teaching of medical ethics: Students’ perception in different periods of the course. Rev Méd Chil 2011;139:36 44.
Kalateh Sadati A, Heidari ST, Bagheri Lankarani K, Keshavarzi MH. Experience of medical ethics in practice: A qualitative study among medical students in south of Iran. Interdiscip J Virtual Learn Med Sci 2022;13:43 53.
Khaghanizade M, Malaki H, Abbasi M, Abbaspour A, Mohamadi E. Faculty related challenges in medical ethics education: A qualitative study. Iran J Med Educ 2012;11:903 16.
Dehghani A. Factors affecting professional ethics development in students: A qualitative study. Nurs Ethics 2020;27:461 9.
Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. New York City, Sage Publications; 2014.
Mathes EW. An evolutionary perspective on Kohlberg’s theory of moral development. Curr Psychol 2021;40:3908 21.
Polit D, Beck C. Essentials of Nursing Research: Appraising Evidence for Nursing Practice. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2020.
Patanella D. Piaget’s theory of moral development. In: Goldstein S, Naglieri JA, editors. Encyclopedia of Child Behavior and Development. Boston, MA: Springer US; 2011. p. 1109 11.
Mathes EW. An evolutionary perspective on Kohlberg’s theory of moral development. Current Psychology. 2021;40:3908-21.
Khursheed U, Sehar S, Afzal M. Importance of ethical decision making; application of James Rest model. Saudi J Nurs Health Care 2019. doi: 10.36348/sjnhc. 2019.v02i12.007.
Bandura A, Walters RH. Social Learning Theory. Hoboken, New Jersey, U.S, Englewood Cliffs Prentice Hall; 1977.
Van Rompay Bartels I, Tuninga RS. Toward a model of global citizenship in business education. J Transnational Manag 2023;28:5 34.
Zagzebski L. Exemplarist Moral Theory. Oxford, England, Oxford University Press; 2017.
Levin J, Milgrom P. Introduction to Choice Theory. 2004. Available from: https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/51415678/ Choice_Theory-libre.pdf?1484775229=&response-content-dispo sition=inline%3B+filename%3DIntroduction_to_Choice_Theory. pdf&Expires=1704039743&Signature=GA~~fKWGEXSzYeNO6 ygVWQbQuGJq6XL6r09DnOE2wU-6SZFZTX1hqmNOD1uPoe knDOsM3CsbubGW3K79YXB3TiAzfICl4WGk4FCUshjIzJ8wz2 JzriBAw7HgBFCBQg2pRF~CiYI5YGueshhxfsEXPItavmaclMsl xUYn-ZmZsaOfWKelhfiiPq7Fa19Cr0aFZUJc7e7ftVoYtYbekxph FzlGZ2TIuEg5yYyNKjNV~mcnukaJaBN057zKiXhtqTOM0vIQ xvz9FLpFTqR~aB1J7oDpHVb0WRXwupvw-X8euIPZRHu5ji9r 3kSJgDPv9WYmM59dv0Yf9eRM7aN uDCu2A__&Key Pair Id =APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.